Validating and refining a psychoacoustic test to diagnose hyperacusis

Decreased sound tolerance refers to conditions like hyperacusis and misophonia, in which everyday sounds may provoke discomfort or distress. Hyperacusis is characterized by exaggerated loudness perception and aversive reactions to moderate to loud sounds, often leading to significant impairment. Despite its estimated prevalence of 10-15 %, no objective clinical test exists. Current assessment relies on interviews, questionnaires, and loudness discomfort levels (LDLs), which lack reliability and ecological validity. Recent work has shown that pleasantness ratings of natural sounds can differentiate individuals with hyperacusis from controls. A subset of seven natural sounds, termed Core Discriminant Sounds (CDS<sub>hyper</sub>), was identified post-hoc as particularly effective, yielding 81 % sensitivity and 88 % specificity in prior lab-based testing. A similar approach for misophonia identified ten distinct trigger sounds (CDS<sub>miso</sub>). This study aimed to validate a tablet-based version of the CDS test to diagnose hyperacusis prospectively. Forty-nine participants (20 with hyperacusis, 29 controls) completed the test that presented randomly CDS<sub>hyper</sub> and CDS<sub>miso</sub> sounds at 60, 70, and 80 dBA. Participants rated each sound presentation on visual analog scales for pleasantness and loudness. Hyperacusis was defined by clinical complaints, Hyperacusis Questionnaire scores (≥22), and LDLs (≤77 dB HL). Results showed that individuals with hyperacusis rated CDS<sub>hyper</sub> sounds as significantly less pleasant (means score of 39 vs 25 for hyperacusis vs controls, p = .002, η² = 0.185) and louder (means score of 71 vs 63 for hyperacusis vs controls, p = .024, η² = 0.104) than controls. No group differences emerged for misophonia trigger sounds (CDS<sub>miso</sub> sounds). The sensitivity and specificity for the combined CDS<sub>hyper</sub> scores of pleasantness and loudness at detecting hyperacusis were 90 % and 69 %, respectively. These findings validate the tablet-based test as an efficient, ecologically valid tool for diagnosing hyperacusis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hearing Research
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109482
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating and refining a psychoacoustic test to diagnose hyperacusis

Claudia Côté, A. Cote, Philippe Fournier, Arnaud Noreña et al.
Hearing Research
Noise Effects and Management
article

Validating and refining a psychoacoustic test to diagnose hyperacusis

Claudia Côté, A. Cote, Philippe Fournier, Arnaud Noreña, Pierre H Bourez, Nicolas Detroy
article en

Abstract

Decreased sound tolerance refers to conditions like hyperacusis and misophonia, in which everyday sounds may provoke discomfort or distress. Hyperacusis is characterized by exaggerated loudness perception and aversive reactions to moderate to loud sounds, often leading to significant impairment. Despite its estimated prevalence of 10-15 %, no objective clinical test exists. Current assessment relies on interviews, questionnaires, and loudness discomfort levels (LDLs), which lack reliability and ecological validity. Recent work has shown that pleasantness ratings of natural sounds can differentiate individuals with hyperacusis from controls. A subset of seven natural sounds, termed Core Discriminant Sounds (CDS<sub>hyper</sub>), was identified post-hoc as particularly effective, yielding 81 % sensitivity and 88 % specificity in prior lab-based testing. A similar approach for misophonia identified ten distinct trigger sounds (CDS<sub>miso</sub>). This study aimed to validate a tablet-based version of the CDS test to diagnose hyperacusis prospectively. Forty-nine participants (20 with hyperacusis, 29 controls) completed the test that presented randomly CDS<sub>hyper</sub> and CDS<sub>miso</sub> sounds at 60, 70, and 80 dBA. Participants rated each sound presentation on visual analog scales for pleasantness and loudness. Hyperacusis was defined by clinical complaints, Hyperacusis Questionnaire scores (≥22), and LDLs (≤77 dB HL). Results showed that individuals with hyperacusis rated CDS<sub>hyper</sub> sounds as significantly less pleasant (means score of 39 vs 25 for hyperacusis vs controls, p = .002, η² = 0.185) and louder (means score of 71 vs 63 for hyperacusis vs controls, p = .024, η² = 0.104) than controls. No group differences emerged for misophonia trigger sounds (CDS<sub>miso</sub> sounds). The sensitivity and specificity for the combined CDS<sub>hyper</sub> scores of pleasantness and loudness at detecting hyperacusis were 90 % and 69 %, respectively. These findings validate the tablet-based test as an efficient, ecologically valid tool for diagnosing hyperacusis.

Hearing ResearchVol. 469
Inserm (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CA), Centres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CA), Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FR)
Aix-Marseille Université, Université Laval, Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation, Institut de Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Québec, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.