Clinical application and potential benefits of En-bloc biopsy based on minimally invasive surgery in advanced lung cancer

Background and objective: Traditional biopsy methods often limit diagnostic accuracy and treatment options due to inadequate tissue samples. En-bloc biopsy (EB), a minimally invasive technique, offers adequate tissue for both pathological and genetic analysis while reducing tumor burden. This study evaluates the clinical applicability and survival benefits of EB in advanced lung cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed advanced lung cancer patients with pulmonary tumors and distant metastases confirmed by PET-CT, who underwent EB via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at our center from 2010 to 2020. Clinical characteristics, pathological and genetic results, surgical details, and survival data were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) between: (1) targeted vs. non-targeted therapies within the EB group, and (2) EB vs. traditional biopsy, with further subgroup analysis focusing on targeted therapy recipients and stage IVA patients. Results: Among 142 patients (majority male, non-smokers, under 65, ECOG 0–1), 128 (90.1 ​%) had adenocarcinoma. No severe perioperative complications or early postoperative deaths occurred. All 132 genetic samples were valid; 62.9 ​% were EGFR-positive. Median follow-up was 52.0 months; median OS, 66.0 months. In the EB group, targeted therapy was linked to longer OS than non-targeted (80.0 vs. 43.0 months, p ​= ​0.0445). EB outperformed traditional biopsy in OS (66.0 vs. 28.0 months, p ​= ​0.0025). Subgroups receiving targeted therapy (HR ​= ​0.55, p ​= ​0.0260) and with stage IVA disease (HR ​= ​0.66, p ​= ​0.0338) showed survival benefit. Conclusion: VATS-based EB is safe and feasible in advanced lung cancer, improves access to precision therapy, and significantly prolongs survival.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cson.2025.100108
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical application and potential benefits of En-bloc biopsy based on minimally invasive surgery in advanced lung cancer

Bei Jiang, Shan Xiong, Caichen Li, Xin Zheng et al.
Clinical Surgical Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Clinical application and potential benefits of En-bloc biopsy based on minimally invasive surgery in advanced lung cancer

Bei Jiang, Shan Xiong, Caichen Li, Xin Zheng, Hengrui Liang, Wenhai Fu, Xian-Zhe Fan, Yihai Wei, Dingrong Zhong, Yi Feng, Bo Cheng, Liping Liu, Chunyan Li, Feng Li, Zhuang Yu, Jiang Tao Shi, Qi Cai, Yi Zhao, Shuting Zhan, Jianfu Li, Peiling Chen, Wenhua Liang, Jianxing He, Ran Zhong, S. Lao, Yang Xiang
article en

Abstract

Background and objective: Traditional biopsy methods often limit diagnostic accuracy and treatment options due to inadequate tissue samples. En-bloc biopsy (EB), a minimally invasive technique, offers adequate tissue for both pathological and genetic analysis while reducing tumor burden. This study evaluates the clinical applicability and survival benefits of EB in advanced lung cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed advanced lung cancer patients with pulmonary tumors and distant metastases confirmed by PET-CT, who underwent EB via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at our center from 2010 to 2020. Clinical characteristics, pathological and genetic results, surgical details, and survival data were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) between: (1) targeted vs. non-targeted therapies within the EB group, and (2) EB vs. traditional biopsy, with further subgroup analysis focusing on targeted therapy recipients and stage IVA patients. Results: Among 142 patients (majority male, non-smokers, under 65, ECOG 0–1), 128 (90.1 ​%) had adenocarcinoma. No severe perioperative complications or early postoperative deaths occurred. All 132 genetic samples were valid; 62.9 ​% were EGFR-positive. Median follow-up was 52.0 months; median OS, 66.0 months. In the EB group, targeted therapy was linked to longer OS than non-targeted (80.0 vs. 43.0 months, p ​= ​0.0445). EB outperformed traditional biopsy in OS (66.0 vs. 28.0 months, p ​= ​0.0025). Subgroups receiving targeted therapy (HR ​= ​0.55, p ​= ​0.0260) and with stage IVA disease (HR ​= ​0.66, p ​= ​0.0338) showed survival benefit. Conclusion: VATS-based EB is safe and feasible in advanced lung cancer, improves access to precision therapy, and significantly prolongs survival.

Clinical Surgical OncologyVol. 4(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.