Anticoagulation in renal impairment: Indications, clinical profiles, and complications from a colombian high-complexity hospital

Anticoagulation in patients with renal impairment (RI) carries an increased risk of complications. This study aimed to assess clinical and therapeutic differences among anticoagulated patients across stages of renal dysfunction. An observational study was conducted in patients receiving anticoagulation with creatinine clearance <60 mL/min. Based on creatinine clearance, patients were classified as G3a, G3b, G4, or G5. Baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, and complications were evaluated. A total of 802 patients were included in the study (median age 79.5 years [IQR 70.1–86.5]; 53.2 % female): G3a (n = 418), G3b (n = 244), G4 (n = 100), and G5 (n = 40). Among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (n = 314), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were preferred, with apixaban the most frequently used therapy; reduced-dose regimens predominated in advanced RI (G4: 65.8 %, G5: 94.4 %). In venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients (n = 294), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the predominant therapy (70.6 % in G5). For other indications (n = 181), LMWH and warfarin were the most frequently used. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 78 patients (10.1 %), including 36 patients with major bleeds (4.5 %), numerically higher rates in were found in G4–G5. Thromboembolic events were observed in 36 patients (4.9 %), mainly cerebral ischemia. The overall cohort showed a median HASBLED score of 3, consistent with a high bleeding risk. In RI patients, DOAC were preferred in the AF group, often at reduced doses in advanced stages, whereas LMWH was mostly used for VTE. This elderly, multimorbid population showed high bleeding and thrombotic event rates, underscoring the need for individualized anticoagulant strategies and close monitoring. • Renal impairment increases hemorrhagic and thrombotic risk in anticoagulated patients. • This is one of the first Latin American studies on anticoagulation in renal impairment. • Elderly patients with cancer and comorbidities showed high bleeding and thrombotic risk. • DOAC predominated in AF, while LMWH was preferred for VTE; reduced doses in severe RI. • Anticoagulant choice should reflect renal stage, comorbidities, and complication risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thrombosis Update
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tru.2025.100227
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticoagulation in renal impairment: Indications, clinical profiles, and complications from a colombian high-complexity hospital

Wikler Bernal Torres, Hoover León-Giraldo, Clara Marín, Juan Esteban Gómez‐Mesa et al.
Thrombosis Update
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Anticoagulation in renal impairment: Indications, clinical profiles, and complications from a colombian high-complexity hospital

Wikler Bernal Torres, Hoover León-Giraldo, Clara Marín, Juan Esteban Gómez‐Mesa, Arturo D. Mora, María Camila Naranjo-Ramírez, Carlos E. Durán-Rebolledo, Miguel Eduardo Jáuregui, David Alejandro Rodríguez Pantoja, Saulo Andrés Quiñones-Cañaveral, Judith Andrea Rivas Amaris
article en

Abstract

Anticoagulation in patients with renal impairment (RI) carries an increased risk of complications. This study aimed to assess clinical and therapeutic differences among anticoagulated patients across stages of renal dysfunction. An observational study was conducted in patients receiving anticoagulation with creatinine clearance <60 mL/min. Based on creatinine clearance, patients were classified as G3a, G3b, G4, or G5. Baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, and complications were evaluated. A total of 802 patients were included in the study (median age 79.5 years [IQR 70.1–86.5]; 53.2 % female): G3a (n = 418), G3b (n = 244), G4 (n = 100), and G5 (n = 40). Among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (n = 314), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were preferred, with apixaban the most frequently used therapy; reduced-dose regimens predominated in advanced RI (G4: 65.8 %, G5: 94.4 %). In venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients (n = 294), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the predominant therapy (70.6 % in G5). For other indications (n = 181), LMWH and warfarin were the most frequently used. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 78 patients (10.1 %), including 36 patients with major bleeds (4.5 %), numerically higher rates in were found in G4–G5. Thromboembolic events were observed in 36 patients (4.9 %), mainly cerebral ischemia. The overall cohort showed a median HASBLED score of 3, consistent with a high bleeding risk. In RI patients, DOAC were preferred in the AF group, often at reduced doses in advanced stages, whereas LMWH was mostly used for VTE. This elderly, multimorbid population showed high bleeding and thrombotic event rates, underscoring the need for individualized anticoagulant strategies and close monitoring. • Renal impairment increases hemorrhagic and thrombotic risk in anticoagulated patients. • This is one of the first Latin American studies on anticoagulation in renal impairment. • Elderly patients with cancer and comorbidities showed high bleeding and thrombotic risk. • DOAC predominated in AF, while LMWH was preferred for VTE; reduced doses in severe RI. • Anticoagulant choice should reflect renal stage, comorbidities, and complication risks.

Thrombosis UpdateVol. 21
Fundación Valle del Lili (CO), Clínica Santa María (CO), Icesi University (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.