Statistical validation of a non-isokinetic solids sampler for low-flux CFBs using Geldart C particles

Accurate determination of the solid flux in circulating fluidized beds (CFBs), particularly low-flux systems (< 8 kg.m −2 .s −1 ), is challenging. This study validates a non-isokinetic solid sampling technique for low-flux dry and semi-dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) CFBs, where conventional isokinetic and non-invasive methods, such as radioactive particle tracking and electrical capacitance volume tomography (ECVT), encounter limitations. This study presents an experimental and statistical analysis that quantifies the influence of suction velocity on solid flux measurements in low-flux CFB systems, using Geldart Group C particles to validate the non-isokinetic sampling technique. It focuses on environments under varying flow velocity conditions. Bland-Altman plots, Kruskal-Wallis test, and one-way ANOVA were used to determine the statistical significance of the difference in measurements obtained at different probe suction velocities. It was found that solids flux measurements taken in a riser with an average superficial gas velocity of 3.8 m.s −1 at probe suction velocities of 2 m.s −1 , 3.8 m.s −1 , 5 m.s −1 , and 8 m.s −1 exhibit comparable solids flux distributions. The maximum bias between the measurements obtained at these varying suction velocities was 0.06, and the p -value obtained from the one-way ANOVA test was 0.96, indicating that there was no statistical difference between the measurements taken at different suction velocities. These findings substantiate the reliability of the non-isokinetic sampling method for solid flux measurements in low-flux CFBs and contribute to the future characterization of flow patterns in such systems. The results suggest that the bias escalates with the rise in the solid flux load within the system, although additional investigation is needed to validate this preliminary observation. • A custom-built non-isokinetic sampler was validated for measuring solids flux in low-flux FGD-CFB risers operating below 8 kg·m −2 ·s −1 . • Statistical analysis (Bland-Altman, Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA) confirmed probe suction velocity (2–8 m·s −1 ) has negligible effect on flux measurements. • Results support the use of non-isokinetic sampling in Geldart C particle systems where conventional methods are limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Powder Technology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121922
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical validation of a non-isokinetic solids sampler for low-flux CFBs using Geldart C particles

Cecilia M. Botha, Abraham F. van der Merwe, Frederik H. Conradie
Powder Technology
Granular flow and fluidized beds
article

Statistical validation of a non-isokinetic solids sampler for low-flux CFBs using Geldart C particles

Cecilia M. Botha, Abraham F. van der Merwe, Frederik H. Conradie
article en

Abstract

Accurate determination of the solid flux in circulating fluidized beds (CFBs), particularly low-flux systems (< 8 kg.m −2 .s −1 ), is challenging. This study validates a non-isokinetic solid sampling technique for low-flux dry and semi-dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) CFBs, where conventional isokinetic and non-invasive methods, such as radioactive particle tracking and electrical capacitance volume tomography (ECVT), encounter limitations. This study presents an experimental and statistical analysis that quantifies the influence of suction velocity on solid flux measurements in low-flux CFB systems, using Geldart Group C particles to validate the non-isokinetic sampling technique. It focuses on environments under varying flow velocity conditions. Bland-Altman plots, Kruskal-Wallis test, and one-way ANOVA were used to determine the statistical significance of the difference in measurements obtained at different probe suction velocities. It was found that solids flux measurements taken in a riser with an average superficial gas velocity of 3.8 m.s −1 at probe suction velocities of 2 m.s −1 , 3.8 m.s −1 , 5 m.s −1 , and 8 m.s −1 exhibit comparable solids flux distributions. The maximum bias between the measurements obtained at these varying suction velocities was 0.06, and the p -value obtained from the one-way ANOVA test was 0.96, indicating that there was no statistical difference between the measurements taken at different suction velocities. These findings substantiate the reliability of the non-isokinetic sampling method for solid flux measurements in low-flux CFBs and contribute to the future characterization of flow patterns in such systems. The results suggest that the bias escalates with the rise in the solid flux load within the system, although additional investigation is needed to validate this preliminary observation. • A custom-built non-isokinetic sampler was validated for measuring solids flux in low-flux FGD-CFB risers operating below 8 kg·m −2 ·s −1 . • Statistical analysis (Bland-Altman, Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA) confirmed probe suction velocity (2–8 m·s −1 ) has negligible effect on flux measurements. • Results support the use of non-isokinetic sampling in Geldart C particle systems where conventional methods are limited.

Powder TechnologyVol. 470
North-West University (ZA), Institute for Security Studies (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.