Assessing enterprise competitiveness in Thailand: A multi-dimensional approach

This study examines enterprise competitiveness in Thailand using a theoretically-grounded five-pillar framework integrating Porter's competitive forces, Resource-Based View, and Dynamic Capabilities Theory. Analyzing 15 indicators across Productivity, Profitability, Image, Stability, and Growth dimensions for over 800 Thai enterprises using the DataStream database, we reveal heterogeneous competitive profiles among top performers with significant industry concentration in Capital Goods, Healthcare, and Consumer Distribution sectors. Our dual-aggregation methodology comparing arithmetic and geometric means demonstrates substantial measurement sensitivity, with arithmetic means proving more appropriate for Thailand's competitive context. Most enterprises exhibit distinctive strengths in specific dimensions rather than balanced excellence, suggesting multiple strategic pathways to competitive advantage. Based on systematic analysis of internal capabilities and external environmental factors, we provide evidence-based recommendations for enhancing enterprise competitiveness through targeted capability development and strategic positioning. This research offers valuable insights for business leaders designing competitive strategies and policymakers strengthening Thailand's economic landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Management Review
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2025.100396
Primary Topic
Global Trade and Competitiveness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing enterprise competitiveness in Thailand: A multi-dimensional approach

Nopphol Witvorapong, Der‐Chiang Li, I-Lin Wang, San Sampattavanija et al.
Asia Pacific Management Review
Global Trade and Competitiveness
article

Assessing enterprise competitiveness in Thailand: A multi-dimensional approach

Nopphol Witvorapong, Der‐Chiang Li, I-Lin Wang, San Sampattavanija, Yong Ki Yoon, Panutat Satchachai
article en

Abstract

This study examines enterprise competitiveness in Thailand using a theoretically-grounded five-pillar framework integrating Porter's competitive forces, Resource-Based View, and Dynamic Capabilities Theory. Analyzing 15 indicators across Productivity, Profitability, Image, Stability, and Growth dimensions for over 800 Thai enterprises using the DataStream database, we reveal heterogeneous competitive profiles among top performers with significant industry concentration in Capital Goods, Healthcare, and Consumer Distribution sectors. Our dual-aggregation methodology comparing arithmetic and geometric means demonstrates substantial measurement sensitivity, with arithmetic means proving more appropriate for Thailand's competitive context. Most enterprises exhibit distinctive strengths in specific dimensions rather than balanced excellence, suggesting multiple strategic pathways to competitive advantage. Based on systematic analysis of internal capabilities and external environmental factors, we provide evidence-based recommendations for enhancing enterprise competitiveness through targeted capability development and strategic positioning. This research offers valuable insights for business leaders designing competitive strategies and policymakers strengthening Thailand's economic landscape.

Asia Pacific Management ReviewVol. 31(1)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Global Trade and Competitiveness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.