Transferability of hazard management skills to speed management and vice versa: a driving simulator study

• Speed feedback reduced young drivers’ speed management (SM) behaviour. • Commentary training improved hazard management (HM) skills. • No transfer of learning from SM training to HM skills, and vice versa. • Future research should examine integrated HM and SM training. Deficiencies in Hazard Management (HM) and Speed Management (SM) skills have been widely recognised as leading contributing factors to the high crash rate with young novice drivers. Although existing training programmes have shown to be effective in enhancing either HM or SM individually, the extent to which these skills transfer remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present research is to investigate if training interventions targeting one skill set, such as HM training, generalise to SM skills, and vice versa. Ninety young novice drivers were randomly assigned to one of five training conditions: Control, Implicit Training, Combined Feedback, HM Training, and HM Training with HM Feedback, and subsequently assessed on HM and SM performance across two post-training sessions (immediately after training and one-week post training) using a fixed-base driving simulator. The results revealed the benefit (significantly improved hazard mitigation) of ‘HM Training with HM Feedback’ for both concealed (i.e., Environmental Prediction) and divided focus (i.e., Divided Focus and Attention) hazards, but not hazards that were visible to participants (i.e., Behavioural Prediction), and this effect lasted up to one-week post training. In terms of SM, the ‘Combined Feedback’ group consistently showed improved SM skills (spent less time over the speed limit), and this effect was most evident in the lower speed zone of 50 km/h, as opposed to 80 km/h. This effect was also evident one-week post training. In terms of skills transfer, no skill generalisation occurred between HM and SM. These findings underscore the need for innovative training approaches that can simultaneously develop both critical competencies concurrently and enhance the overall safety of young drivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.103451
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transferability of hazard management skills to speed management and vice versa: a driving simulator study

Оleksandra Molloy, Brett R. C. Molesworth, Boripat Ratchaneepun
1 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Traffic and Road Safety
1.30
article

Transferability of hazard management skills to speed management and vice versa: a driving simulator study

Оleksandra Molloy, Brett R. C. Molesworth, Boripat Ratchaneepun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Speed feedback reduced young drivers’ speed management (SM) behaviour. • Commentary training improved hazard management (HM) skills. • No transfer of learning from SM training to HM skills, and vice versa. • Future research should examine integrated HM and SM training. Deficiencies in Hazard Management (HM) and Speed Management (SM) skills have been widely recognised as leading contributing factors to the high crash rate with young novice drivers. Although existing training programmes have shown to be effective in enhancing either HM or SM individually, the extent to which these skills transfer remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present research is to investigate if training interventions targeting one skill set, such as HM training, generalise to SM skills, and vice versa. Ninety young novice drivers were randomly assigned to one of five training conditions: Control, Implicit Training, Combined Feedback, HM Training, and HM Training with HM Feedback, and subsequently assessed on HM and SM performance across two post-training sessions (immediately after training and one-week post training) using a fixed-base driving simulator. The results revealed the benefit (significantly improved hazard mitigation) of ‘HM Training with HM Feedback’ for both concealed (i.e., Environmental Prediction) and divided focus (i.e., Divided Focus and Attention) hazards, but not hazards that were visible to participants (i.e., Behavioural Prediction), and this effect lasted up to one-week post training. In terms of SM, the ‘Combined Feedback’ group consistently showed improved SM skills (spent less time over the speed limit), and this effect was most evident in the lower speed zone of 50 km/h, as opposed to 80 km/h. This effect was also evident one-week post training. In terms of skills transfer, no skill generalisation occurred between HM and SM. These findings underscore the need for innovative training approaches that can simultaneously develop both critical competencies concurrently and enhance the overall safety of young drivers.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 117
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Traffic and Road Safety
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.