Diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility in Indian academic libraries

This study examines how diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility are understood and practiced in Indian academic libraries. A survey of 214 professionals across institutional types shows high conceptual awareness of inclusivity and diversity but lower engagement with equity and accessibility. Only 22.9% report formal diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility training and 35% report active involvement, revealing an awareness–action gap. Factor analysis identifies two strong dimensions shaping outcomes: perceived challenges (limited training, policy voids, staff resistance, weak community engagement) and institutional support (leadership prioritization, resources, funding, feedback mechanisms). The differences by gender, age, and role are minimal; education level relates to perceptual variation. Overall, institutional deficits, rather than individual attitudes, impede implementation. The study recommends mandatory, context-sensitive training, leadership advocacy, policy integration, and systematic user feedback to translate awareness into measurable diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility practice in Indian academic libraries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251392266
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility in Indian academic libraries

Dattatraya Kalbande, A Subaveerapandiyan, Somipam R. Shimray, Priyanka Sinha
IFLA Journal
Library Science and Administration
article

Diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility in Indian academic libraries

Dattatraya Kalbande, A Subaveerapandiyan, Somipam R. Shimray, Priyanka Sinha
article en

Abstract

This study examines how diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility are understood and practiced in Indian academic libraries. A survey of 214 professionals across institutional types shows high conceptual awareness of inclusivity and diversity but lower engagement with equity and accessibility. Only 22.9% report formal diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility training and 35% report active involvement, revealing an awareness–action gap. Factor analysis identifies two strong dimensions shaping outcomes: perceived challenges (limited training, policy voids, staff resistance, weak community engagement) and institutional support (leadership prioritization, resources, funding, feedback mechanisms). The differences by gender, age, and role are minimal; education level relates to perceptual variation. Overall, institutional deficits, rather than individual attitudes, impede implementation. The study recommends mandatory, context-sensitive training, leadership advocacy, policy integration, and systematic user feedback to translate awareness into measurable diversity, equity, inclusivity, and accessibility practice in Indian academic libraries.

IFLA Journal
Girls Incorporated (US), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (IN), Vinayaka Missions University (IN), Swami Rama Himalayan University (IN), Bennett University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Library Science and Administration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.