On Levenshtein’s Reconstruction Problem for Channels with Unique Insertion Error Patterns

Levenshtein’s sequence reconstruction model plays an essential role in information retrieval in DNA-based storage systems. In this model, a word ${\text{x}} \in {\mathbb{Z}}_q^n$ is transmitted through N noisy channels, and the goal is to recover the original word exactly, or with a small uncertainty ${\mathcal{L}}$, using the outputs from these channels. Errors occurring in the channels usually involve substitutions, insertions or deletions. In this paper, we focus on insertion errors, which we represent using (so-called) insertion vectors. One of the main questions in this context is determining the minimum number of channels N required to recover the word either unambiguously or within a given precision ${\mathcal{L}}$. The original formulation of Levenshtein’s reconstruction problem requires that all the outputs from the channels are distinct. However, different channels may produce the same output word even when different errors occur. In this paper, we investigate two generalized reconstruction models where the channels are allowed to produce the same output word as long as, in each channel, different errors occur (that is, the errors correspond to different insertion vectors). Our objective is to determine the number of channels N required to uniquely recover the transmitted word x under these conditions. We present several results in this direction, some of which are optimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/itw62417.2025.11240278
Primary Topic
DNA and Biological Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Levenshtein’s Reconstruction Problem for Channels with Unique Insertion Error Patterns

Tero Laihonen, Ville Junnila, Tuomo Lehtilä, P. Devaraj
DNA and Biological Computing
article

On Levenshtein’s Reconstruction Problem for Channels with Unique Insertion Error Patterns

Tero Laihonen, Ville Junnila, Tuomo Lehtilä, P. Devaraj
article en

Abstract

Levenshtein’s sequence reconstruction model plays an essential role in information retrieval in DNA-based storage systems. In this model, a word ${\text{x}} \in {\mathbb{Z}}_q^n$ is transmitted through N noisy channels, and the goal is to recover the original word exactly, or with a small uncertainty ${\mathcal{L}}$, using the outputs from these channels. Errors occurring in the channels usually involve substitutions, insertions or deletions. In this paper, we focus on insertion errors, which we represent using (so-called) insertion vectors. One of the main questions in this context is determining the minimum number of channels N required to recover the word either unambiguously or within a given precision ${\mathcal{L}}$. The original formulation of Levenshtein’s reconstruction problem requires that all the outputs from the channels are distinct. However, different channels may produce the same output word even when different errors occur. In this paper, we investigate two generalized reconstruction models where the channels are allowed to produce the same output word as long as, in each channel, different errors occur (that is, the errors correspond to different insertion vectors). Our objective is to determine the number of channels N required to uniquely recover the transmitted word x under these conditions. We present several results in this direction, some of which are optimal.

University of Turku (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
DNA and Biological Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.