A guide to selecting psychological interventions that can be delivered by people who are not mental health specialists in low-resource settings

Globally, most individuals with mental health conditions lack access to specialized care. One strategy to bridge this gap is training people who are not mental health professionals (non-specialists) to deliver brief, manualized psychological interventions, which have demonstrated effectiveness across diverse settings. However, selecting the most suitable intervention for specific populations, contexts, and psychological needs in low-resource settings can be challenging due to the growing number of possible interventions and the differences in evidence of benefits across them. To facilitate this decision-making process, we provide an overview of ten psychological interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness in randomized controlled trials when delivered by non-specialists in low-resource settings for adults: Cognitive Processing Therapy, Common Elements Treatment Approach, Counseling for Alcohol Problems, Friendship Bench, Group Interpersonal Therapy, Healthy Activity Program, Problem Management Plus, Self-Help Plus, Step-by-Step, and the Thinking Healthy Programme. The interventions vary in settings where they have demonstrated effectiveness and the evidence for which conditions show benefit (e.g., depression, posttraumatic stress, substance use, general psychological distress). Considerations when selecting interventions also include the duration of treatment, ranging from 4 to 16 sessions, and the duration of training required for non-specialists, spanning from 5 to 12 days. This article, along with its visual summaries, serves as a guide to support selection of psychological interventions based on population needs, mental health conditions, and available resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005123
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A guide to selecting psychological interventions that can be delivered by people who are not mental health specialists in low-resource settings

Pragya Shrestha, Bryan Cheng, Jerome Timothy Galea, Ruta Brazinskaite et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

A guide to selecting psychological interventions that can be delivered by people who are not mental health specialists in low-resource settings

Pragya Shrestha, Bryan Cheng, Jerome Timothy Galea, Ruta Brazinskaite, Mansurat Raji, Josephine Akellot, Sauharda Rai, Brandon A. Kohrt, Nathaniel Ross, Adam D. Brown
article en

Abstract

Globally, most individuals with mental health conditions lack access to specialized care. One strategy to bridge this gap is training people who are not mental health professionals (non-specialists) to deliver brief, manualized psychological interventions, which have demonstrated effectiveness across diverse settings. However, selecting the most suitable intervention for specific populations, contexts, and psychological needs in low-resource settings can be challenging due to the growing number of possible interventions and the differences in evidence of benefits across them. To facilitate this decision-making process, we provide an overview of ten psychological interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness in randomized controlled trials when delivered by non-specialists in low-resource settings for adults: Cognitive Processing Therapy, Common Elements Treatment Approach, Counseling for Alcohol Problems, Friendship Bench, Group Interpersonal Therapy, Healthy Activity Program, Problem Management Plus, Self-Help Plus, Step-by-Step, and the Thinking Healthy Programme. The interventions vary in settings where they have demonstrated effectiveness and the evidence for which conditions show benefit (e.g., depression, posttraumatic stress, substance use, general psychological distress). Considerations when selecting interventions also include the duration of treatment, ranging from 4 to 16 sessions, and the duration of training required for non-specialists, spanning from 5 to 12 days. This article, along with its visual summaries, serves as a guide to support selection of psychological interventions based on population needs, mental health conditions, and available resources.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(11)
The New School (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), George Washington University (US), University of South Florida (US), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), Kathmandu University (NP), New York University (US), Columbia University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Hologic (Germany) (DE), Uganda Christian University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.