Understanding learners' perceptions of artificial intelligence-mediated Informal Digital Learning of English: A Q methodology approach

Artificial intelligence-mediated informal digital English learning (AI-IDLE) creates new possibilities for language learning beyond the formal classroom. Its core value lies not only in the learning convenience empowered by technology, but also in its potential to meet learners' psychological needs. Analyzing the technology acceptance behavior in AI-IDLE from a psychological perspective involves revealing the formation mechanism of behavioral intention under the interaction of cognitive evaluation, emotional experience, and social influence. This requires moving beyond a surface-level description of tool effectiveness and exploring how individuals construct subjective psychological processes in making technology adoption decisions. This study investigates Chinese university students' perceptions of AI-IDLE by integrating The Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) with Q methodology. A total of 34 students participated in a Q-sort task concerning their experiences with AI-IDLE, followed by retrospective interviews to elicit in-depth reflections. The analysis revealed three primary factors shaping students' engagement with AI-IDLE: (1) Interactive Engagement, (2) A Bipolar Dimension: Digitally Scaffolded Adopters vs. Externally Constrained Skeptics, and (3) Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use. Factor 1, distinctive in degree and mechanism relative to non-AI technologies, stems from human-computer interaction and highlights the emotional and informational support provided by AI, thereby significantly enhancing learners' positive affective experiences, relational appraisals, and intention to use. Factor 2 encompasses two poles: digitally scaffolded adopters and externally constrained skeptics, emphasizing the role of external support from online communities, teachers, peers, and family, particularly noting the influential role of the digital environment. Factor 3 centers on learners' performance and effort expectancies, recognizing AI as an effective tool for achieving personal learning goals. Furthermore, this study extends the UTAUT2 framework by recontextualizing the construct of Price Value within the educational setting and expanding it into a broader Cost-Value perspective. The findings offer practical implications for both learners and educators seeking to optimize AI-mediated informal English learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105980
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding learners' perceptions of artificial intelligence-mediated Informal Digital Learning of English: A Q methodology approach

Shenglin Guo, Miaoyue Xia
2 citations
Acta Psychologica
Q Methodology Applications
4.21
article

Understanding learners' perceptions of artificial intelligence-mediated Informal Digital Learning of English: A Q methodology approach

Shenglin Guo, Miaoyue Xia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence-mediated informal digital English learning (AI-IDLE) creates new possibilities for language learning beyond the formal classroom. Its core value lies not only in the learning convenience empowered by technology, but also in its potential to meet learners' psychological needs. Analyzing the technology acceptance behavior in AI-IDLE from a psychological perspective involves revealing the formation mechanism of behavioral intention under the interaction of cognitive evaluation, emotional experience, and social influence. This requires moving beyond a surface-level description of tool effectiveness and exploring how individuals construct subjective psychological processes in making technology adoption decisions. This study investigates Chinese university students' perceptions of AI-IDLE by integrating The Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) with Q methodology. A total of 34 students participated in a Q-sort task concerning their experiences with AI-IDLE, followed by retrospective interviews to elicit in-depth reflections. The analysis revealed three primary factors shaping students' engagement with AI-IDLE: (1) Interactive Engagement, (2) A Bipolar Dimension: Digitally Scaffolded Adopters vs. Externally Constrained Skeptics, and (3) Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use. Factor 1, distinctive in degree and mechanism relative to non-AI technologies, stems from human-computer interaction and highlights the emotional and informational support provided by AI, thereby significantly enhancing learners' positive affective experiences, relational appraisals, and intention to use. Factor 2 encompasses two poles: digitally scaffolded adopters and externally constrained skeptics, emphasizing the role of external support from online communities, teachers, peers, and family, particularly noting the influential role of the digital environment. Factor 3 centers on learners' performance and effort expectancies, recognizing AI as an effective tool for achieving personal learning goals. Furthermore, this study extends the UTAUT2 framework by recontextualizing the construct of Price Value within the educational setting and expanding it into a broader Cost-Value perspective. The findings offer practical implications for both learners and educators seeking to optimize AI-mediated informal English learning.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 261
South China Agricultural University (CN), Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Q Methodology Applications
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.