A critical review of cushion gas in underground hydrogen storage: Thermophysical properties, interfacial interactions, and numerical perspectives

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) represents a large-scale energy storage system, aiming to ensure a consistent supply by storing hydrogen generated from surplus energy. In the practice of UHS, cushion gas is typically injected into the formation to maintain reservoir pressure for efficient hydrogen withdrawal. This paper reviews the impact of cushion gas on the performance of UHS from both experimental and numerical simulation perspectives. The thermophysical (e.g., density, viscosity, compressibility, and solubility) and petrophysical (interfacial tension, wettability, and relative permeability) properties, as well as the mixing and diffusion behavior of different cushion gases, were compared. The corresponding impact of different cushion gases on plume migration and trapping potential is then discussed. Furthermore, this review critically analyzes and explains the impact of various factors on the performance of UHS, including the type of cushion gas, the composition of cushion gas mixtures, the volume of injected cushion gas, and the effects of bio-methanation processes. The corresponding analysis specifically focuses on key performance indicators, including H<sub>2</sub> recovery factor, formation pressure, brine production, and H<sub>2</sub> outflow purity. Thus, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the role of cushion gas in UHS, offering insight into the effective management and optimization of cushion gas injection in field-scale UHS operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2025.103701
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical review of cushion gas in underground hydrogen storage: Thermophysical properties, interfacial interactions, and numerical perspectives

Yihuai Zhang, Muhammad Arif, Haiyang Zhang
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

A critical review of cushion gas in underground hydrogen storage: Thermophysical properties, interfacial interactions, and numerical perspectives

Yihuai Zhang, Muhammad Arif, Haiyang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) represents a large-scale energy storage system, aiming to ensure a consistent supply by storing hydrogen generated from surplus energy. In the practice of UHS, cushion gas is typically injected into the formation to maintain reservoir pressure for efficient hydrogen withdrawal. This paper reviews the impact of cushion gas on the performance of UHS from both experimental and numerical simulation perspectives. The thermophysical (e.g., density, viscosity, compressibility, and solubility) and petrophysical (interfacial tension, wettability, and relative permeability) properties, as well as the mixing and diffusion behavior of different cushion gases, were compared. The corresponding impact of different cushion gases on plume migration and trapping potential is then discussed. Furthermore, this review critically analyzes and explains the impact of various factors on the performance of UHS, including the type of cushion gas, the composition of cushion gas mixtures, the volume of injected cushion gas, and the effects of bio-methanation processes. The corresponding analysis specifically focuses on key performance indicators, including H<sub>2</sub> recovery factor, formation pressure, brine production, and H<sub>2</sub> outflow purity. Thus, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the role of cushion gas in UHS, offering insight into the effective management and optimization of cushion gas injection in field-scale UHS operations.

Advances in Colloid and Interface ScienceVol. 347
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.