Regional dynamics in evapotranspiration components, crop coefficients, and water productivity of vineyards

Estimation of water balance components, crop coefficients, and water productivity at multiple locations are crucial for understanding regional dynamics in irrigation requirement and efficient use of scarce water resources. These parameters were estimated for irrigated Shiraz vineyards over 3 consecutive seasons (2018–19–2020–21) at 48 locations in the Barossa, South Australia using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach. Results showed large variability in water balance parameters, crop and water stress coefficients, and water productivity. A coefficient of variation ranging from 20 % to 97 % was observed in daily and seasonal actual evapotranspiration across sites and seasons. Average actual transpiration and evaporation account for around 63 and 37 % of the seasonal actual evapotranspiration, respectively, showing the potential to save water lost to the environment from the soil surface. Estimated actual single crop coefficient across all sites varied from 0.32 to 0.76, 0.35–0.59, 0.16–0.62 and 0.16–0.64 during the initial day (D60) to budburst (initial), budburst to flowering (mid1), flowering to veraison (mid2), and veraison to harvest (late) stages of crop growth, respectively. The actual basal crop coefficients for grapevine reveal considerable site-specific variability, questioning the value of adopting uniform coefficients across growth stages and at subregional and regional levels. Water stress gradually increased reaching its peak from late November to early December, with variations across the region ranging from 20 % to 64 %. A comparison of water productivities in relation to seasonal actual evapotranspiration and transpiration exhibits 60 % higher values for the latter across all the sites and subregions. Locally estimated crop coefficients will contribute to the efficient use of limited freshwater resources for sustainable wine grape production. • Evapotranspiration components, crop coefficients (K c ), and water productivity of winegrape were estimated at 48 locations • Large variation (20–97 %) in the actual crop evapotranspiration (ET c act ) was observed across the region • Actual average single (K c ) and basal (K cb ) coefficients were markedly lower than the non-stressed and tabulated values • Water productivity in relation to actual transpiration (T c act ) exhibited 60 % higher values than ETc act • Adoption of uniform coefficients for irrigation at regional level induce inefficient water use

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109955
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional dynamics in evapotranspiration components, crop coefficients, and water productivity of vineyards

Paul R. Petrie, Marcos Bonada, Cassandra Collins, V. Phogat
1 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.11
article

Regional dynamics in evapotranspiration components, crop coefficients, and water productivity of vineyards

Paul R. Petrie, Marcos Bonada, Cassandra Collins, V. Phogat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Estimation of water balance components, crop coefficients, and water productivity at multiple locations are crucial for understanding regional dynamics in irrigation requirement and efficient use of scarce water resources. These parameters were estimated for irrigated Shiraz vineyards over 3 consecutive seasons (2018–19–2020–21) at 48 locations in the Barossa, South Australia using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach. Results showed large variability in water balance parameters, crop and water stress coefficients, and water productivity. A coefficient of variation ranging from 20 % to 97 % was observed in daily and seasonal actual evapotranspiration across sites and seasons. Average actual transpiration and evaporation account for around 63 and 37 % of the seasonal actual evapotranspiration, respectively, showing the potential to save water lost to the environment from the soil surface. Estimated actual single crop coefficient across all sites varied from 0.32 to 0.76, 0.35–0.59, 0.16–0.62 and 0.16–0.64 during the initial day (D60) to budburst (initial), budburst to flowering (mid1), flowering to veraison (mid2), and veraison to harvest (late) stages of crop growth, respectively. The actual basal crop coefficients for grapevine reveal considerable site-specific variability, questioning the value of adopting uniform coefficients across growth stages and at subregional and regional levels. Water stress gradually increased reaching its peak from late November to early December, with variations across the region ranging from 20 % to 64 %. A comparison of water productivities in relation to seasonal actual evapotranspiration and transpiration exhibits 60 % higher values for the latter across all the sites and subregions. Locally estimated crop coefficients will contribute to the efficient use of limited freshwater resources for sustainable wine grape production. • Evapotranspiration components, crop coefficients (K c ), and water productivity of winegrape were estimated at 48 locations • Large variation (20–97 %) in the actual crop evapotranspiration (ET c act ) was observed across the region • Actual average single (K c ) and basal (K cb ) coefficients were markedly lower than the non-stressed and tabulated values • Water productivity in relation to actual transpiration (T c act ) exhibited 60 % higher values than ETc act • Adoption of uniform coefficients for irrigation at regional level induce inefficient water use

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 322
Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (AU), Flinders University (AU), South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), Australian Wine Research Institute (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.