Investigating Emotional Practices in Organizations: A Proposal for an Analytical Framework

This article proposes an analytical framework for examining emotional practices in organizations, addressing the lack of reflexive, situated, and methodologically rigorous approaches capable of integrating the discursive, symbolic, and structural dimensions of emotions. Grounded in Pierre Bourdieu’s praxeology and combined with tools from Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP), the framework offers a practice-based lens to investigate how emotions are socially embodied, historically structured, and reproduced within organizational fields. The proposed qualitative approach integrates semi-structured interviews and participant observation as data collection techniques, enabling relational, reflexive, and context-sensitive analyses. By applying Bourdieu’s relational concepts, such as habitus, field, capital, doxa, and illusion, the framework advances understanding of how emotions are experienced, operationalized, and linked to organizational practices, and how ways of feeling, naming, expressing, and regulating become legitimized, marginalized, reproduced, or transformed through symbolic struggles. Unlike studies focusing primarily on the psychological or physiological dimensions of emotions, this proposal adopts a relational and practice-based perspective, considering people, objects, activities, experiences, artifacts, symbolism, and the relationships emerging from these interactions. The framework can contribute to organizational and critical research by addressing issues related to institutionalized emotional dynamics stabilized by norms, routines, and discourses, as well as embodied meanings that reveal how emotions are shaped by bodily dispositions and symbolic repertoires. It also facilitates the analysis of affective hierarchies that regulate the legitimacy and value of emotions across positions and groups, as well as the strategic circulation and mobilization of emotions to influence relational and organizational outcomes. This integrative approach offers both theoretical advancement and an operational pathway for studying emotions as socially embodied practices, expanding the methodological repertoire for qualitative organizational research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251391642
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Emotional Practices in Organizations: A Proposal for an Analytical Framework

Maria Lucia Granja Coutinho, Luciano Mendes, Vinicius Rennó Castro
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Investigating Emotional Practices in Organizations: A Proposal for an Analytical Framework

Maria Lucia Granja Coutinho, Luciano Mendes, Vinicius Rennó Castro
article en

Abstract

This article proposes an analytical framework for examining emotional practices in organizations, addressing the lack of reflexive, situated, and methodologically rigorous approaches capable of integrating the discursive, symbolic, and structural dimensions of emotions. Grounded in Pierre Bourdieu’s praxeology and combined with tools from Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP), the framework offers a practice-based lens to investigate how emotions are socially embodied, historically structured, and reproduced within organizational fields. The proposed qualitative approach integrates semi-structured interviews and participant observation as data collection techniques, enabling relational, reflexive, and context-sensitive analyses. By applying Bourdieu’s relational concepts, such as habitus, field, capital, doxa, and illusion, the framework advances understanding of how emotions are experienced, operationalized, and linked to organizational practices, and how ways of feeling, naming, expressing, and regulating become legitimized, marginalized, reproduced, or transformed through symbolic struggles. Unlike studies focusing primarily on the psychological or physiological dimensions of emotions, this proposal adopts a relational and practice-based perspective, considering people, objects, activities, experiences, artifacts, symbolism, and the relationships emerging from these interactions. The framework can contribute to organizational and critical research by addressing issues related to institutionalized emotional dynamics stabilized by norms, routines, and discourses, as well as embodied meanings that reveal how emotions are shaped by bodily dispositions and symbolic repertoires. It also facilitates the analysis of affective hierarchies that regulate the legitimacy and value of emotions across positions and groups, as well as the strategic circulation and mobilization of emotions to influence relational and organizational outcomes. This integrative approach offers both theoretical advancement and an operational pathway for studying emotions as socially embodied practices, expanding the methodological repertoire for qualitative organizational research.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 24
Instituto Adolfo Lutz (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.