Cross-Sectional Associations Between Personal and General Views on Aging and Future Care Preparation in Individuals Aged 50 and Over and Living in the United Kingdom

IntroductionFuture care preparation refers to those processes during which individuals discuss with healthcare professionals or family members about their future care. This study investigated whether views on aging are associated with future care preparation and whether age moderates these associations.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey with 1,699 participants (mean age = 68 years). Views on aging indicators were perceived age-related gains and losses and expectations regarding aging. Linear regressions were used.ResultsHigher perceived age-related gains (B = 0.12; p-value <0.001) and losses (B = 0.16; p-value <0.001) and less positive expectations regarding physical health while aging (B = -0.11; p-value <0.05) were associated with higher future care preparation. Age did not moderate any association.DiscussionGiven the importance of future care preparation in ensuring optimal health outcomes for older adults, encouraging older adults to have open and frank conversations about their views on aging may be an important first step in eliciting care needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251398098
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Sectional Associations Between Personal and General Views on Aging and Future Care Preparation in Individuals Aged 50 and Over and Living in the United Kingdom

Blossom C. M. Stephan, Rachel C. Ambagtsheer, Tim D. Windsor, Jennifer Dunne et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Cross-Sectional Associations Between Personal and General Views on Aging and Future Care Preparation in Individuals Aged 50 and Over and Living in the United Kingdom

Blossom C. M. Stephan, Rachel C. Ambagtsheer, Tim D. Windsor, Jennifer Dunne, Katya T. Numbers, Elissa Burton, Shelbie Turner, Stephanie Wong, Serena Sabatini, Bethany Wilton-Harding, Eugene Tang, Emily L. Mroz, Claire V. Burley, Fiona S. Rupprecht, Robyn Capithorne Crainey
article en

Abstract

IntroductionFuture care preparation refers to those processes during which individuals discuss with healthcare professionals or family members about their future care. This study investigated whether views on aging are associated with future care preparation and whether age moderates these associations.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey with 1,699 participants (mean age = 68 years). Views on aging indicators were perceived age-related gains and losses and expectations regarding aging. Linear regressions were used.ResultsHigher perceived age-related gains (B = 0.12; p-value <0.001) and losses (B = 0.16; p-value <0.001) and less positive expectations regarding physical health while aging (B = -0.11; p-value <0.05) were associated with higher future care preparation. Age did not moderate any association.DiscussionGiven the importance of future care preparation in ensuring optimal health outcomes for older adults, encouraging older adults to have open and frank conversations about their views on aging may be an important first step in eliciting care needs.

Journal of Applied Gerontology
Emory University (US), University of Kaiserslautern (DE), Flinders University (AU), Curtin University (AU), Cornell University (US), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Brighton Hospital (US), University of Surrey (GB), Department of Health and Aged Care (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Torrens University Australia (AU), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.