Pathology as a Core Discipline in the Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices

The device development process encompasses an intersection of biological, physical, and engineering sciences principles culminating in translation of data from nonclinical animal studies to predict potential tissue responses in human patients. Evaluation of tissue reactions to the implanted device relies heavily on the core discipline of toxicologic pathology. Historically and currently, a disconnect between physical and biological scientists is highlighted by the frequent miscommunications due to differences in scientific language and divergent approaches to animal study design and/or data generation and interpretation. To facilitate communication among biologists, engineers, and materials scientists in the medical device community, this article provides fundamental principles and key resources necessary for rational pathology evaluation of tissue responses to implanted devices from the expert perspective of experienced toxicologic pathologists. The unique contributions of toxicologic pathologists to developing and marketing medical devices will be discussed, emphasizing the role of expert pathologists in balancing scientific issues with respect to evaluating biological responses and regulatory considerations. Additionally, discrepancies will be addressed that may arise if regulatory guidance is applied rigidly rather than adjusted as warranted by the context-specific evidence to best answer particular safety-related questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Toxicology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818251388381
Primary Topic
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathology as a Core Discipline in the Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices

Brad N. Bolon, Kathleen A. Funk, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Abraham Nyska et al.
International Journal of Toxicology
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
article

Pathology as a Core Discipline in the Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices

Brad N. Bolon, Kathleen A. Funk, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Abraham Nyska, Valerie S. Thomas, JoAnn C. L. Schuh, Jaime Paulin
article en

Abstract

The device development process encompasses an intersection of biological, physical, and engineering sciences principles culminating in translation of data from nonclinical animal studies to predict potential tissue responses in human patients. Evaluation of tissue reactions to the implanted device relies heavily on the core discipline of toxicologic pathology. Historically and currently, a disconnect between physical and biological scientists is highlighted by the frequent miscommunications due to differences in scientific language and divergent approaches to animal study design and/or data generation and interpretation. To facilitate communication among biologists, engineers, and materials scientists in the medical device community, this article provides fundamental principles and key resources necessary for rational pathology evaluation of tissue responses to implanted devices from the expert perspective of experienced toxicologic pathologists. The unique contributions of toxicologic pathologists to developing and marketing medical devices will be discussed, emphasizing the role of expert pathologists in balancing scientific issues with respect to evaluating biological responses and regulatory considerations. Additionally, discrepancies will be addressed that may arise if regulatory guidance is applied rigidly rather than adjusted as warranted by the context-specific evidence to best answer particular safety-related questions.

International Journal of ToxicologyVol. 45(2)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Duke University (US), Experimental Pathology Laboratories (US), NewPath Research (US), Zionsville Community High School (US), Virginia Mason Bainbridge Island Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.