Quantifying Autonomy Levels of Traffic Signal Control Within Autonomous Traffic Systems Based on AHP–TOPSIS

With the increasing complexity of transportation systems, traditional qualitative descriptions fail to objectively reflect the level of autonomy in traffic signal control systems—especially the lack of a systematic evaluation framework that links technology synergy, task autonomy, and system-level autonomy. To address this critical systematic gap, this study integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to develop a systematic quantitative classification model for assessing system autonomy. The model constructs a three-level indicator framework—“technology–task–system”—based on the systematic closed-loop architecture of traffic signal control systems (upper interaction layer + lower technology chain layer), thereby enabling a holistic and quantitative evaluation of traffic signal control system autonomy. Results indicate that human involvement in the system decreases from 86% at the non-autonomous L0 level to 13% at the fully autonomous L3 level. This systematic quantitative method first reveals the inherent evolution logic of system autonomy (technology → task → system). Additionally, it provides a theoretical foundation for two key applications: the performance comparison across different traffic signal control systems and the planning of their intelligent development pathways—filling the gap of scattered, non-systematic evaluations in existing research. It also serves as a practical tool for these applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121050
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Autonomy Levels of Traffic Signal Control Within Autonomous Traffic Systems Based on AHP–TOPSIS

Hong Zhu, Keshuang Tang, Yanyue Liu, Kai Li et al.
Systems
Traffic control and management
article

Quantifying Autonomy Levels of Traffic Signal Control Within Autonomous Traffic Systems Based on AHP–TOPSIS

Hong Zhu, Keshuang Tang, Yanyue Liu, Kai Li, Mingli Shi
article en

Abstract

With the increasing complexity of transportation systems, traditional qualitative descriptions fail to objectively reflect the level of autonomy in traffic signal control systems—especially the lack of a systematic evaluation framework that links technology synergy, task autonomy, and system-level autonomy. To address this critical systematic gap, this study integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to develop a systematic quantitative classification model for assessing system autonomy. The model constructs a three-level indicator framework—“technology–task–system”—based on the systematic closed-loop architecture of traffic signal control systems (upper interaction layer + lower technology chain layer), thereby enabling a holistic and quantitative evaluation of traffic signal control system autonomy. Results indicate that human involvement in the system decreases from 86% at the non-autonomous L0 level to 13% at the fully autonomous L3 level. This systematic quantitative method first reveals the inherent evolution logic of system autonomy (technology → task → system). Additionally, it provides a theoretical foundation for two key applications: the performance comparison across different traffic signal control systems and the planning of their intelligent development pathways—filling the gap of scattered, non-systematic evaluations in existing research. It also serves as a practical tool for these applications.

SystemsVol. 13(12)
Tongji University (CN), Ministry of Transport (CN), Research Institute of Highway (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.