Monitoring and evaluating an implementation strategy aimed at improving interprofessional collaboration in community-based fall prevention: a mixed-methods study

This study identified four key themes influencing the implementation process and impact of a multifaceted implementation strategy aimed at improving IPC among HSCPs in community-based fall prevention: network building, team dynamics, coordination and implementation dynamics. Monitoring and evaluation are crucial for identifying the specific activities needed to effectively implement interventions in real-world settings. Given the complexity of implementation processes and ongoing contextual changes, continuous adjustments are necessary. An iterative monitoring and evaluation approach, as used in this study, enables these adaptations and maximizes real-world impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00814-w
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring and evaluating an implementation strategy aimed at improving interprofessional collaboration in community-based fall prevention: a mixed-methods study

Cindy Veenhof, Saskia J. te Velde, Meike C. van Scherpenseel, Di‐Janne Barten et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Monitoring and evaluating an implementation strategy aimed at improving interprofessional collaboration in community-based fall prevention: a mixed-methods study

Cindy Veenhof, Saskia J. te Velde, Meike C. van Scherpenseel, Di‐Janne Barten, Lidia J. van Veenendaal, Marielle H. Emmelot-Vonk
article en

Abstract

This study identified four key themes influencing the implementation process and impact of a multifaceted implementation strategy aimed at improving IPC among HSCPs in community-based fall prevention: network building, team dynamics, coordination and implementation dynamics. Monitoring and evaluation are crucial for identifying the specific activities needed to effectively implement interventions in real-world settings. Given the complexity of implementation processes and ongoing contextual changes, continuous adjustments are necessary. An iterative monitoring and evaluation approach, as used in this study, enables these adaptations and maximizes real-world impact.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 6(1)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Centers (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nationaal Regieorgaan Praktijkgericht Onderzoek SIA
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monitoring and evaluating an implementation strategy aimed at improving interprofessional collaboration in community-based fall prevention: a mixed-methods study — Cindy Veenhof, Saskia J. te Velde, et al. · Implementation Science Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS