Reference Genes in Plant–Pathogen Interaction: A Bibliometric Analysis

Plant–pathogen interactions are complex biological processes characterized by dynamic changes in genes expression. In molecular plant pathology research, RT-qPCR has proven to be a valuable tool for investigating plant–pathogen interactions by examining gene expression changes in both plants and pathogens during infection. The choice of reliable reference genes is crucial, as this directly affects the robustness of normalization and the accuracy of analyzing the expression of genes of interest. A systematic literature search was conducted across relevant academic databases, resulting in the selection of 47 articles (38 on fungi and oomycetes, 7 on bacteria and 2 covering both bacteria, fungi and oomycetes) that evaluated the stability of 190 candidate reference genes. The most used reference genes in plant—fungal and oomycete pathosystems were GAPDH, ACT, TUB and EF, whereas UBQ, TUB, EF and ACT were most used in plant—bacterial pathosystems. Reference genes revealed considerable variability in their stability across different crops, pathogens and experimental conditions. Notably, several classical reference genes, traditionally assumed to maintain stable expression, exhibited considerable variability, supporting concerns regarding their reliability as universal references. Therefore, this review provides important insights for researchers seeking to identify suitable reference genes for their validation studies in plant–pathogen interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Horticulturae
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121416
Primary Topic
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference Genes in Plant–Pathogen Interaction: A Bibliometric Analysis

A. Lizzio, Milena Petriccione, E. Lahoz, Massimo Reverberi et al.
Horticulturae
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
article

Reference Genes in Plant–Pathogen Interaction: A Bibliometric Analysis

A. Lizzio, Milena Petriccione, E. Lahoz, Massimo Reverberi, Valerio Battaglia
article en

Abstract

Plant–pathogen interactions are complex biological processes characterized by dynamic changes in genes expression. In molecular plant pathology research, RT-qPCR has proven to be a valuable tool for investigating plant–pathogen interactions by examining gene expression changes in both plants and pathogens during infection. The choice of reliable reference genes is crucial, as this directly affects the robustness of normalization and the accuracy of analyzing the expression of genes of interest. A systematic literature search was conducted across relevant academic databases, resulting in the selection of 47 articles (38 on fungi and oomycetes, 7 on bacteria and 2 covering both bacteria, fungi and oomycetes) that evaluated the stability of 190 candidate reference genes. The most used reference genes in plant—fungal and oomycete pathosystems were GAPDH, ACT, TUB and EF, whereas UBQ, TUB, EF and ACT were most used in plant—bacterial pathosystems. Reference genes revealed considerable variability in their stability across different crops, pathogens and experimental conditions. Notably, several classical reference genes, traditionally assumed to maintain stable expression, exhibited considerable variability, supporting concerns regarding their reliability as universal references. Therefore, this review provides important insights for researchers seeking to identify suitable reference genes for their validation studies in plant–pathogen interaction.

HorticulturaeVol. 11(12)
Cereal Research Centre (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
National Research Centre, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.