Progressive Development of a Paraglacial Rock Slope Failure at Portage Glacier, Alaska

Abstract Paraglacial landscapes are rapidly transforming as thinning and retreating glaciers expose adjacent slopes to new conditions. In Southcentral Alaska, a large slope instability at Portage Glacier has been deforming progressively up‐glacier over the past six decades. The instability comprises two deep‐seated rock slope segments, Portage A and Portage B, located above the thinning and retreating Portage Glacier and its proglacial lake. Portage B lies at the glacier terminus, while the down‐glacier margin of Portage A is about 300 m further up‐glacier. To understand the mechanisms driving slope deformation, we integrated field observations, historical imagery, structural and kinematic analysis, differential DEMs, InSAR, and coherence radar to capture both short‐ and long‐term deformation patterns. We identified three distinct domains of movement: two in Portage A and one in Portage B. Our findings reveal that Portage A experiences rapid and variable displacement rates, whereas Portage B shows slower motion. Structural analysis indicates translational sliding and toppling as primary failure mechanisms controlled by pre‐existing geological discontinuities. Glacier thinning is identified as a key factor, initiating movement and enabling the progressive spatial up‐glacier propagation of deformation from Portage B to Portage A. But this process is not solely driven by thinning; rather, it reflects how ice loss progressively alters mechanical boundary conditions, granting kinematic freedom for the rock mass to deform along pre‐existing structural discontinuities. Consequently, our results underscore the importance of considering both glacier thickness thresholds and structural geology to better understand and assess the onset and evolution of slope deformation in paraglacial environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jf008255
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progressive Development of a Paraglacial Rock Slope Failure at Portage Glacier, Alaska

J. Walden, Pooya Hamdi, Anja Dufresne, Florian Amann et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Progressive Development of a Paraglacial Rock Slope Failure at Portage Glacier, Alaska

J. Walden, Pooya Hamdi, Anja Dufresne, Florian Amann, Mylène Jacquemart, Andrea Manconi, Bretwood Higman, Emilie Lemaire
article en

Abstract

Abstract Paraglacial landscapes are rapidly transforming as thinning and retreating glaciers expose adjacent slopes to new conditions. In Southcentral Alaska, a large slope instability at Portage Glacier has been deforming progressively up‐glacier over the past six decades. The instability comprises two deep‐seated rock slope segments, Portage A and Portage B, located above the thinning and retreating Portage Glacier and its proglacial lake. Portage B lies at the glacier terminus, while the down‐glacier margin of Portage A is about 300 m further up‐glacier. To understand the mechanisms driving slope deformation, we integrated field observations, historical imagery, structural and kinematic analysis, differential DEMs, InSAR, and coherence radar to capture both short‐ and long‐term deformation patterns. We identified three distinct domains of movement: two in Portage A and one in Portage B. Our findings reveal that Portage A experiences rapid and variable displacement rates, whereas Portage B shows slower motion. Structural analysis indicates translational sliding and toppling as primary failure mechanisms controlled by pre‐existing geological discontinuities. Glacier thinning is identified as a key factor, initiating movement and enabling the progressive spatial up‐glacier propagation of deformation from Portage B to Portage A. But this process is not solely driven by thinning; rather, it reflects how ice loss progressively alters mechanical boundary conditions, granting kinematic freedom for the rock mass to deform along pre‐existing structural discontinuities. Consequently, our results underscore the importance of considering both glacier thickness thresholds and structural geology to better understand and assess the onset and evolution of slope deformation in paraglacial environments.

Journal of Geophysical Research Earth SurfaceVol. 130(11)
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies IEG (DE), Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (CH), Alaska Neurology Center (US), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.