The transformation-mainstreaming conundrum: Making sense of tensions in adaptation practice

As the scale of climate change impacts become apparent, organisations globally are seeking to adapt. They face dual imperatives of transformation-going beyond business-as-usual to embrace disruptive changes to their decision-making processes-and mainstreaming-enacting adaptation initiatives with minimal change to existing capabilities and structures. In practice, these important imperatives can conflict, leading to the emergence of multiple tensions in developing and implementing adaptation initiatives, potentially paralysing action or leading to one imperative dominating. We call this the Transformation-Mainstreaming Conundrum (TMC) and suggest that both imperatives can (and must be) pursued simultaneously in practice. This perspective identifies recognisable tensions that can arise when seeking to address both imperatives and suggest steps towards responding to the underlying issues these tensions reveal. The TMC needs to be recognised, and approaches to navigating its tensions must be addressed explicitly in both scholarship and practice, to re-energise the urgency of scaling up adaptation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02271-0
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The transformation-mainstreaming conundrum: Making sense of tensions in adaptation practice

Deborah O’Connell, Seona Meharg, Mark Stafford‐Smith, Russell Gorddard et al.
AMBIO
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

The transformation-mainstreaming conundrum: Making sense of tensions in adaptation practice

Deborah O’Connell, Seona Meharg, Mark Stafford‐Smith, Russell Gorddard, Roger Street, Minh Ngoc Nguyen, Russell M. Wise, Rachel Williams, Michael Dunlop, Yiheyis Maru
article en

Abstract

As the scale of climate change impacts become apparent, organisations globally are seeking to adapt. They face dual imperatives of transformation-going beyond business-as-usual to embrace disruptive changes to their decision-making processes-and mainstreaming-enacting adaptation initiatives with minimal change to existing capabilities and structures. In practice, these important imperatives can conflict, leading to the emergence of multiple tensions in developing and implementing adaptation initiatives, potentially paralysing action or leading to one imperative dominating. We call this the Transformation-Mainstreaming Conundrum (TMC) and suggest that both imperatives can (and must be) pursued simultaneously in practice. This perspective identifies recognisable tensions that can arise when seeking to address both imperatives and suggest steps towards responding to the underlying issues these tensions reveal. The TMC needs to be recognised, and approaches to navigating its tensions must be addressed explicitly in both scholarship and practice, to re-energise the urgency of scaling up adaptation efforts.

AMBIOVol. 55(4)
Australian National University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), University of Oxford (GB), CSIRO Land and Water (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.