Data-driven prediction of cattle weight gain for evaluating key growth factors with machine learning approaches

Abstract Accurate prediction of cattle weight gain is critical for optimizing herd management, improving productivity, and promoting sustainable livestock practices. Traditional monitoring methods, such as manual data collection and periodic surveys, often lack the precision and timeliness required for reliable forecasting. This study evaluated multiple machine learning models Linear Regression, Decision Tree Regression, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVM) to predict cattle weight at 36 months and identify the key factors influencing growth. A comprehensive historical dataset was preprocessed to handle missing values, correct inconsistencies, and engineer relevant features. Models were assessed using R-squared (R 2 ), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) to evaluate predictive accuracy and robustness. Results indicated that weights at 30, 24, and 18 months were the strongest predictors of final weight, demonstrating the cumulative effect of early growth. Additional influential factors included breed (notably Zebu), grazing type, and cattle movement frequency, while birth weight showed a negative association, reflecting compensatory growth in lighter-born calves. Environmental variables such as temperature and seasonal conditions had moderate but consistent effects. The Decision Tree model, with the highest predictive performance (R 2 = 0.927; MAE = 2.21 kg; RMSE = 2.95 kg), provided the most interpretable and actionable insights. Linear Regression, XGBoost, and SVM offered complementary predictions but with slightly lower accuracy or interpretability. These findings provide quantitative insights into cattle growth dynamics and demonstrate the utility of machine learning for data-driven decision-making in livestock management. The study supports the adoption of predictive models, improved data collection protocols, and targeted management interventions during critical growth periods to optimize cattle production sustainably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Computing
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09798-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven prediction of cattle weight gain for evaluating key growth factors with machine learning approaches

Michael Adelani Adewusi, Kenneth Tuyishime
1 citations
Discover Computing
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
1.19
article

Data-driven prediction of cattle weight gain for evaluating key growth factors with machine learning approaches

Michael Adelani Adewusi, Kenneth Tuyishime
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Accurate prediction of cattle weight gain is critical for optimizing herd management, improving productivity, and promoting sustainable livestock practices. Traditional monitoring methods, such as manual data collection and periodic surveys, often lack the precision and timeliness required for reliable forecasting. This study evaluated multiple machine learning models Linear Regression, Decision Tree Regression, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVM) to predict cattle weight at 36 months and identify the key factors influencing growth. A comprehensive historical dataset was preprocessed to handle missing values, correct inconsistencies, and engineer relevant features. Models were assessed using R-squared (R 2 ), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) to evaluate predictive accuracy and robustness. Results indicated that weights at 30, 24, and 18 months were the strongest predictors of final weight, demonstrating the cumulative effect of early growth. Additional influential factors included breed (notably Zebu), grazing type, and cattle movement frequency, while birth weight showed a negative association, reflecting compensatory growth in lighter-born calves. Environmental variables such as temperature and seasonal conditions had moderate but consistent effects. The Decision Tree model, with the highest predictive performance (R 2 = 0.927; MAE = 2.21 kg; RMSE = 2.95 kg), provided the most interpretable and actionable insights. Linear Regression, XGBoost, and SVM offered complementary predictions but with slightly lower accuracy or interpretability. These findings provide quantitative insights into cattle growth dynamics and demonstrate the utility of machine learning for data-driven decision-making in livestock management. The study supports the adoption of predictive models, improved data collection protocols, and targeted management interventions during critical growth periods to optimize cattle production sustainably.

Discover ComputingVol. 28(1)
Kampala International University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data-driven prediction of cattle weight gain for evaluating key growth factors with machine learning approaches — Michael Adelani Adewusi, Kenneth Tuyishime · Discover Computing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS