Machine learning-driven spatial-spectral-contextual analysis of airborne hyperspectral data for water quality assessment

Accurate, high‑resolution mapping of water turbidity is essential for inland ecosystem management, yet conventional field sampling and simple remote‑sensing techniques remain labour‑intensive and scale‑limited. Airborne hyperspectral imagery offers rich spectral detail, but its operational use for quantitative turbidity retrieval has been hampered by sparse ground truth and the lack of scalable, interpretable workflows. To address these gaps, we present an end‑to‑end machine‑learning framework that couples AVIRIS‑NG reflectance (400–800 nm, 8 m resolution) with different machine learning based ensemble regressors: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and a Voting ensemble (VR), trained on just 33 in situ turbidity samples. We masked water pixels using NDWI > 0, subsampled ~ 100,000 spectra, and tuned models with five-fold cross-validation. Performance was reported on a 30% hold-out test set. XGBoost achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.87; RMSE = 4.68 NTU), followed by VR (R² = 0.84; RMSE = 5.33 NTU) and RF (R² = 0.81; RMSE = 5.73 NTU); GB was more conservative (R² = 0.74; RMSE = 6.85 NTU). Notably, despite its lower overall accuracy, RF captured the widest turbidity range, up to 117 NTU, highlighting its strength in extreme-value retrieval. Pearson correlation at diagnostic bands in the mid-visible (619–642 nm) and red‑edge (772–787 nm) regions yielded r = 0.68–0.90, confirming strong linear links between spectral reflectance and turbidity. Zone‑wise SHAP analyses revealed that mid‑visible bands dominate under low turbidity (< 15 NTU), whereas green and red‑edge wavelengths drive predictions in moderate (15–45 NTU) and high (> 45 NTU) regimes. Our workflow matches or surpasses spectral‑library methods without extensive field campaigns, offering a scalable, interpretable solution for hyperspectral turbidity monitoring that can inform real‑time water‑quality management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07768-7
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-driven spatial-spectral-contextual analysis of airborne hyperspectral data for water quality assessment

Vaibhav Garg, Prasun Kumar Gupta, Anant Dikshit
Discover Applied Sciences
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Machine learning-driven spatial-spectral-contextual analysis of airborne hyperspectral data for water quality assessment

Vaibhav Garg, Prasun Kumar Gupta, Anant Dikshit
article en

Abstract

Accurate, high‑resolution mapping of water turbidity is essential for inland ecosystem management, yet conventional field sampling and simple remote‑sensing techniques remain labour‑intensive and scale‑limited. Airborne hyperspectral imagery offers rich spectral detail, but its operational use for quantitative turbidity retrieval has been hampered by sparse ground truth and the lack of scalable, interpretable workflows. To address these gaps, we present an end‑to‑end machine‑learning framework that couples AVIRIS‑NG reflectance (400–800 nm, 8 m resolution) with different machine learning based ensemble regressors: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and a Voting ensemble (VR), trained on just 33 in situ turbidity samples. We masked water pixels using NDWI > 0, subsampled ~ 100,000 spectra, and tuned models with five-fold cross-validation. Performance was reported on a 30% hold-out test set. XGBoost achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.87; RMSE = 4.68 NTU), followed by VR (R² = 0.84; RMSE = 5.33 NTU) and RF (R² = 0.81; RMSE = 5.73 NTU); GB was more conservative (R² = 0.74; RMSE = 6.85 NTU). Notably, despite its lower overall accuracy, RF captured the widest turbidity range, up to 117 NTU, highlighting its strength in extreme-value retrieval. Pearson correlation at diagnostic bands in the mid-visible (619–642 nm) and red‑edge (772–787 nm) regions yielded r = 0.68–0.90, confirming strong linear links between spectral reflectance and turbidity. Zone‑wise SHAP analyses revealed that mid‑visible bands dominate under low turbidity (< 15 NTU), whereas green and red‑edge wavelengths drive predictions in moderate (15–45 NTU) and high (> 45 NTU) regimes. Our workflow matches or surpasses spectral‑library methods without extensive field campaigns, offering a scalable, interpretable solution for hyperspectral turbidity monitoring that can inform real‑time water‑quality management.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 7(12)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IN)
Indian Space Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.