LONG VERSUS SHORT INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS FOR TROCHANTERIC HIP FRACTURES: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE INSITE TRIAL

We aimed to use data from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the sliding hip screw vs. intramedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures to examine complication rates between those managed with a short vs. long nail. This is a secondary analysis using one arm of an RCT that included ambulatory patients ³18 years with AO type 31-A1 or 31-A2 trochanteric fractures. We examined differences in fracture-related (femoral shaft fracture, implant failure, surgical site infection, nonunion, limb shortening, and pain) and medical adverse events (AE, organ failure, respiratory distress, stroke, deep vein thrombosis [DVT] gastrointestinal upset, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, sepsis, or urinary tract infection [UTI]), and readmission between those managed with a short vs. long IMN. We used logistic regression to examine the independent association between nail length and outcomes. We included 412 trochanteric fracture patients managed with an IMN. Of these, 339 (82.2%) received a short (170mm-200mm) nail, while 73 (17.7%) received a long (260mm-460 mm) nail. Patients managed with a short nail were more likely to be admitted from an institution (vs. home), while those managed with a long nail were more likely to have comorbidities, and more complex fracture types. Patients in the long nail group had higher rates of fracture-related AE (12.3%) vs. the short IMN group (3.5%). Specifically, the unadjusted rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and pain were significantly higher in the long group (SSI: 5.5%, pain: 2.7%) compared to the short group (SSI: 0.3%, pain: 0.0%). Similarly, patients in the long group were more likely to develop DVT (Long: 2.7%; Short: 0.3%), and readmitted to the hospital (Long: 28.8%; short: 20.7%). Following covariable adjustment, long nails remained independently associated with a higher odds of fracture-related AE (5.11, 1.96-13.33) compared to short nails. We found no association between the odds of readmission and nail length following covariable adjustment (1.00, 0.52-1.94). Our analyses revealed that trochanteric fracture patients managed with long IMN nails (260mm-460mm) may have a higher odds of fracture-related AE compared to short nails (170mm to 200mm). Future research is required to validate these findings with larger event rates, and further optimize IMN for trochanteric fracture patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.14.043
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LONG VERSUS SHORT INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS FOR TROCHANTERIC HIP FRACTURES: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE INSITE TRIAL

Justin de Beer, Mohit Bhandari, Rudolf Wilhelm Poolman, Dirk Stengel et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

LONG VERSUS SHORT INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS FOR TROCHANTERIC HIP FRACTURES: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE INSITE TRIAL

Justin de Beer, Mohit Bhandari, Rudolf Wilhelm Poolman, Dirk Stengel, Samir Mehta, Ole Brink, Lauren L. Nowak, Emil H. Schemitsch
article en

Abstract

We aimed to use data from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the sliding hip screw vs. intramedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures to examine complication rates between those managed with a short vs. long nail. This is a secondary analysis using one arm of an RCT that included ambulatory patients ³18 years with AO type 31-A1 or 31-A2 trochanteric fractures. We examined differences in fracture-related (femoral shaft fracture, implant failure, surgical site infection, nonunion, limb shortening, and pain) and medical adverse events (AE, organ failure, respiratory distress, stroke, deep vein thrombosis [DVT] gastrointestinal upset, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, sepsis, or urinary tract infection [UTI]), and readmission between those managed with a short vs. long IMN. We used logistic regression to examine the independent association between nail length and outcomes. We included 412 trochanteric fracture patients managed with an IMN. Of these, 339 (82.2%) received a short (170mm-200mm) nail, while 73 (17.7%) received a long (260mm-460 mm) nail. Patients managed with a short nail were more likely to be admitted from an institution (vs. home), while those managed with a long nail were more likely to have comorbidities, and more complex fracture types. Patients in the long nail group had higher rates of fracture-related AE (12.3%) vs. the short IMN group (3.5%). Specifically, the unadjusted rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and pain were significantly higher in the long group (SSI: 5.5%, pain: 2.7%) compared to the short group (SSI: 0.3%, pain: 0.0%). Similarly, patients in the long group were more likely to develop DVT (Long: 2.7%; Short: 0.3%), and readmitted to the hospital (Long: 28.8%; short: 20.7%). Following covariable adjustment, long nails remained independently associated with a higher odds of fracture-related AE (5.11, 1.96-13.33) compared to short nails. We found no association between the odds of readmission and nail length following covariable adjustment (1.00, 0.52-1.94). Our analyses revealed that trochanteric fracture patients managed with long IMN nails (260mm-460mm) may have a higher odds of fracture-related AE compared to short nails (170mm to 200mm). Future research is required to validate these findings with larger event rates, and further optimize IMN for trochanteric fracture patients.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_14)
London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.