Beyond GDP metrics: Can the cadre performance evaluation system and climate policy synergise to promote carbon reduction?–Evidence from Chinese counties

Large gaps in the implementation of climate policies pose a challenge to the achievement of greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. The lack of incentives in the cadre performance evaluation system (CPES) for climate governance constitutes a major cause of the implementation gap. Against this backdrop, the Chinese government has initiated a cadre performance evaluation system transformation (CPEST) in some counties, aiming to reshape the GDP-centred evaluation system. The study links the CPEST to six climate policies and assesses the impact of mixing the two on carbon emissions, employing county-level data spanning 2008-2022 and applying the Difference-in-Differences (DID) model. The study reveals notable synergistic effects between climate policy and CPEST. This effect is particularly prominent in mandatory climate policies and weaker in market-based climate policies. Further tests indicate that goal alignment significantly boosts the synergistic effect between CPES and climate policy when CPES shifts to prioritise green development. Time order is also important; climate policies implemented prior to CPEST contribute to enhancing the mixing effects of the two, yet this contribution is insufficient to generate synergistic effects. The mixing effects of the two are also affected by officials’ characteristics. Specifically, stronger mixing effects are more closely linked to officials who are younger, female, hold a master’s degree, and work in their hometowns. Mechanism analyses show that industrial structure upgrading, green technology innovation, environmental fiscal expenditure, and environmental penalties are the main ways in which policy mixing promotes carbon reduction. However, only the latter three mechanisms can generate policy synergistic effects. The study’s findings offer a significant reference for improving the efficacy of climate policies and reducing carbon emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06247-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond GDP metrics: Can the cadre performance evaluation system and climate policy synergise to promote carbon reduction?–Evidence from Chinese counties

Qiuzhi Ye, Yongzhou Chen
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
article

Beyond GDP metrics: Can the cadre performance evaluation system and climate policy synergise to promote carbon reduction?–Evidence from Chinese counties

Qiuzhi Ye, Yongzhou Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large gaps in the implementation of climate policies pose a challenge to the achievement of greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. The lack of incentives in the cadre performance evaluation system (CPES) for climate governance constitutes a major cause of the implementation gap. Against this backdrop, the Chinese government has initiated a cadre performance evaluation system transformation (CPEST) in some counties, aiming to reshape the GDP-centred evaluation system. The study links the CPEST to six climate policies and assesses the impact of mixing the two on carbon emissions, employing county-level data spanning 2008-2022 and applying the Difference-in-Differences (DID) model. The study reveals notable synergistic effects between climate policy and CPEST. This effect is particularly prominent in mandatory climate policies and weaker in market-based climate policies. Further tests indicate that goal alignment significantly boosts the synergistic effect between CPES and climate policy when CPES shifts to prioritise green development. Time order is also important; climate policies implemented prior to CPEST contribute to enhancing the mixing effects of the two, yet this contribution is insufficient to generate synergistic effects. The mixing effects of the two are also affected by officials’ characteristics. Specifically, stronger mixing effects are more closely linked to officials who are younger, female, hold a master’s degree, and work in their hometowns. Mechanism analyses show that industrial structure upgrading, green technology innovation, environmental fiscal expenditure, and environmental penalties are the main ways in which policy mixing promotes carbon reduction. However, only the latter three mechanisms can generate policy synergistic effects. The study’s findings offer a significant reference for improving the efficacy of climate policies and reducing carbon emissions.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Guangxi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.