Defining and validating a multidimensional digital metric of health states in chronic back and leg pain

Chronic pain (CP) is a debilitating condition that extends beyond persistent pain, influenced by physiological and psychological factors. However, clinical trials often evaluate outcomes solely on self-reported pain amplitude. To address this, we aimed to derive a single metric from multidimensional digital data to comprehensively represent wellness in lower back and leg pain. Daily-reported data were collected for five years (>190 K samples, n = 498, from NCT01719055/NCT03240588), comprised of clinical assessments, digitally-reported symptoms, text responses, and smartwatch-based actigraphy. Clustering analysis of the digital data identified five novel symptom clusters. They were validated by comparing centroid distances to standard assessments, revealing five ordinal best-to-worst states (r = 0.34 to r = -0.51, ps < 0.001), even when pain magnitude was similar. Further, patients' text messages about their status associated better with the clusters than pain reports alone. This solution extends beyond a recapitulation of pain level, yielding non-obvious, meaningful states that serve as an actionable metric in CP care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02084-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining and validating a multidimensional digital metric of health states in chronic back and leg pain

Eric Loudermilk, Amol Patwardhan, René Przkora, Mohab Ibrahim et al.
1 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

Defining and validating a multidimensional digital metric of health states in chronic back and leg pain

Eric Loudermilk, Amol Patwardhan, René Przkora, Mohab Ibrahim, James Scowcroft, Rex Woon, Nathan Miller, Julio Paez, Todd Turley, Jeffrey L. Rogers, Matt McDonald, Jenna Reinen, Brad Hershey, Guillermo Cecchi, Gassan Chaiban, Dat Huynh, Louis Bojrab, Carla Agurto, John Noles, Richard Rauck, Kristen Lechleiter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Chronic pain (CP) is a debilitating condition that extends beyond persistent pain, influenced by physiological and psychological factors. However, clinical trials often evaluate outcomes solely on self-reported pain amplitude. To address this, we aimed to derive a single metric from multidimensional digital data to comprehensively represent wellness in lower back and leg pain. Daily-reported data were collected for five years (>190 K samples, n = 498, from NCT01719055/NCT03240588), comprised of clinical assessments, digitally-reported symptoms, text responses, and smartwatch-based actigraphy. Clustering analysis of the digital data identified five novel symptom clusters. They were validated by comparing centroid distances to standard assessments, revealing five ordinal best-to-worst states (r = 0.34 to r = -0.51, ps < 0.001), even when pain magnitude was similar. Further, patients' text messages about their status associated better with the clusters than pain reports alone. This solution extends beyond a recapitulation of pain level, yielding non-obvious, meaningful states that serve as an actionable metric in CP care.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
IBM (United States) (US), University of Arizona (US), Winston-Salem State University (US), Ochsner Medical Center (US), Boston Scientific (United States) (US), University of Florida (US), Hope Research Institute (US), Medical Advanced Pain Specialists (US), Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium (US), IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US), Summit School (US), Spinal Diagnostics and Treatment Center (US), Anderson University - South Carolina (US)
Boston Scientific Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.