Investigating the processing effort in translation students’ L2 writing and L2 translating: evidence from keylogging

Writing and translating overlap in their mechanisms for generating texts, but they remain separate in academic research. This separation has resulted in limited comparative investigations of their dynamics and relationships. This study aimed to bridge this gap by examining how translation students process writing and translating, using a keylogging program. Data were collected from translation students at a university in China. They were asked to complete two tasks: L2 (English) writing (L2W) and L2 (Chinese-to-English) translating (L2T). The processes were recorded by Translog II, a screen recorder, and the think-aloud method. Based on Krings’ (2001) effort framework, which includes temporal effort, technical effort, and cognitive effort, the correlations and differences in processing effort between L2W and L2T were analyzed quantitatively. The results revealed statistically significant correlations between L2W and L2T processing effort metrics, except for the drafting duration and average pause duration at the 10-second threshold. Significantly greater processing effort was observed in L2T in the processing speed, revision duration, miscellaneous events rate, and pause metrics. This study provides potential insights for researchers and teachers into students’ processing effort in L2 text production and possible pedagogical interventions in translator training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06088-w
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the processing effort in translation students’ L2 writing and L2 translating: evidence from keylogging

Jackie Xiu Yan, Xia Chen
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Investigating the processing effort in translation students’ L2 writing and L2 translating: evidence from keylogging

Jackie Xiu Yan, Xia Chen
article en

Abstract

Writing and translating overlap in their mechanisms for generating texts, but they remain separate in academic research. This separation has resulted in limited comparative investigations of their dynamics and relationships. This study aimed to bridge this gap by examining how translation students process writing and translating, using a keylogging program. Data were collected from translation students at a university in China. They were asked to complete two tasks: L2 (English) writing (L2W) and L2 (Chinese-to-English) translating (L2T). The processes were recorded by Translog II, a screen recorder, and the think-aloud method. Based on Krings’ (2001) effort framework, which includes temporal effort, technical effort, and cognitive effort, the correlations and differences in processing effort between L2W and L2T were analyzed quantitatively. The results revealed statistically significant correlations between L2W and L2T processing effort metrics, except for the drafting duration and average pause duration at the 10-second threshold. Significantly greater processing effort was observed in L2T in the processing speed, revision duration, miscellaneous events rate, and pause metrics. This study provides potential insights for researchers and teachers into students’ processing effort in L2 text production and possible pedagogical interventions in translator training.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Northwest Normal University (CN)
City University of Hong Kong, Northwest Normal University, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.