Reconciling time and prediction error theories of associative learning

Learning involves forming associations between sensory events that have a consistent temporal relationship. Influential theories based on prediction errors explain numerous behavioral and neurobiological observations but do not account for how animals measure the passage of time. Here, we propose a theory for temporal causal learning, where the structure of inter-stimulus intervals is used to infer the singular cause of a rewarding stimulus. We show that a single assumption of timescale invariance, formulated as an hierarchical generative model, is sufficient to explain a puzzling set of learning phenomena, including the power-law dependence of acquisition on inter-trial intervals and timescale invariance in response profiles. A biologically plausible algorithm for inference recapitulates salient aspects of both timing and prediction error theories. The theory predicts neural signals with distinct dynamics that encode causal associations and temporal structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65137-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling time and prediction error theories of associative learning

Samuel J. Gershman, Gautam Reddy, Noé Hamou
1 citations
Nature Communications
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
article

Reconciling time and prediction error theories of associative learning

Samuel J. Gershman, Gautam Reddy, Noé Hamou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Learning involves forming associations between sensory events that have a consistent temporal relationship. Influential theories based on prediction errors explain numerous behavioral and neurobiological observations but do not account for how animals measure the passage of time. Here, we propose a theory for temporal causal learning, where the structure of inter-stimulus intervals is used to infer the singular cause of a rewarding stimulus. We show that a single assumption of timescale invariance, formulated as an hierarchical generative model, is sufficient to explain a puzzling set of learning phenomena, including the power-law dependence of acquisition on inter-trial intervals and timescale invariance in response profiles. A biologically plausible algorithm for inference recapitulates salient aspects of both timing and prediction error theories. The theory predicts neural signals with distinct dynamics that encode causal associations and temporal structure.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Harvard University (US), Princeton University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience (GB), 3D Technology Laboratories (United States) (US), University College London (GB)
Princeton University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconciling time and prediction error theories of associative learning — Samuel J. Gershman, Gautam Reddy, et al. · Nature Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS