Strategies to Facilitate Interorganizational Collaboration in County-Level Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response: A Qualitative Analysis

Community-level overdose prevention interventions often require collaboration among organizations from various sectors including emergency medicine, criminal justice, harm reduction, and drug treatment organizations, yet little is known about ways to foster interorganizational collaboration among organizations with very different missions and in different socio-political contexts. This paper presents results from interviews with key informants involved in overdose prevention coalitions in two counties in Wisconsin (n = 45). Key informants were purposively selected from 31 different organizations in sectors including harm reduction, drug treatment, emergency medicine, and law enforcement. Interviews asked participants to describe the overdose crisis in their communities and the work they do, including any partnerships or coalitions formed with other organizations. We conducted thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding. Participants' experiences illuminate strategies and actions that facilitated coalitions' work (interorganizational processes) and changed the context in which they worked to be more accepting of harm reduction efforts and less stigmatizing and punitive toward people who use opioids (PWUO). These included getting the word out in community-facing events to educate the public and destigmatize harm reduction, working with representatives across the CoC in various sectors, and actively working with them to create shared missions. Key people acted as bridges while others had the power to convene multiple agencies to a common cause. Overdose Fatality Reviews (OFRs) were found to be particularly helpful in identifying gaps in the current Opioid CoC and developing programs in collaboration with other organizations to address them. Organizational empowerment offers a useful framework for understanding how to facilitate IOC at the intra- (e.g., community education to reduce stigma, inter- (bridging roles by key actors), and extra-organizational levels (e.g., policy changes supporting naloxone access). These strategies can be used by coalition members and tested in future community-level overdose responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121765
Citations
1
Primary Topic
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies to Facilitate Interorganizational Collaboration in County-Level Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response: A Qualitative Analysis

Sarah Krechel, Julia Dickson‐Gómez, Constance A. Kostelac, Jessica Ohlrich et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
1.35
article

Strategies to Facilitate Interorganizational Collaboration in County-Level Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response: A Qualitative Analysis

Sarah Krechel, Julia Dickson‐Gómez, Constance A. Kostelac, Jessica Ohlrich, Jennifer Hernandez-Meier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Community-level overdose prevention interventions often require collaboration among organizations from various sectors including emergency medicine, criminal justice, harm reduction, and drug treatment organizations, yet little is known about ways to foster interorganizational collaboration among organizations with very different missions and in different socio-political contexts. This paper presents results from interviews with key informants involved in overdose prevention coalitions in two counties in Wisconsin (n = 45). Key informants were purposively selected from 31 different organizations in sectors including harm reduction, drug treatment, emergency medicine, and law enforcement. Interviews asked participants to describe the overdose crisis in their communities and the work they do, including any partnerships or coalitions formed with other organizations. We conducted thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding. Participants' experiences illuminate strategies and actions that facilitated coalitions' work (interorganizational processes) and changed the context in which they worked to be more accepting of harm reduction efforts and less stigmatizing and punitive toward people who use opioids (PWUO). These included getting the word out in community-facing events to educate the public and destigmatize harm reduction, working with representatives across the CoC in various sectors, and actively working with them to create shared missions. Key people acted as bridges while others had the power to convene multiple agencies to a common cause. Overdose Fatality Reviews (OFRs) were found to be particularly helpful in identifying gaps in the current Opioid CoC and developing programs in collaboration with other organizations to address them. Organizational empowerment offers a useful framework for understanding how to facilitate IOC at the intra- (e.g., community education to reduce stigma, inter- (bridging roles by key actors), and extra-organizational levels (e.g., policy changes supporting naloxone access). These strategies can be used by coalition members and tested in future community-level overdose responses.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(12)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.