The Way Calories Are Displayed on Restaurant Menus May Not Affect Calorie Intake: Evidence from an Online Experiment

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Menu calorie labeling policies aim to promote healthier eating habits, yet their effectiveness remains debated. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two alternative qualitative labeling strategies-Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) labels and Percent Daily Intake (PDI) pie charts-compared to the standard numeric calorie count mandated in several countries, since they have been proposed to enhance consumer comprehension and decision-making. <b>Methods:</b> A nationwide online survey elicited responses from N = 885 individuals living in Italy. Survey participants were randomly assigned to one of three menu conditions: (1) numeric calorie labeling only, (2) numeric calories plus PACE labels, or (3) numeric calories plus a PDI pie chart. Participants selected a three-course meal from their respective menus. Data on sociodemographic factors, dietary habits, BMI, self-assessed nutritional knowledge, and psychological traits-restrained eating (DEBQ-R) and impulsivity (SUPPS-P)-were collected. Ordinal logistic regressions assessed the impact of labeling format, gender, and nutritional knowledge on total calories ordered. <b>Results:</b> Neither PACE labels nor PDI pie charts significantly influenced total calorie selection compared to numeric calorie labels alone. No significant interactions emerged between labeling format and gender or nutritional knowledge. However, age, BMI, and dietary habits were strongly associated with calorie choices: older adults, individuals with restrictive diets, and those with higher restrained eating scores selected lower-calorie meals, while participants with higher BMI or frequent meat intake opted for more calorie-dense options. <b>Conclusions:</b> Alternative calorie labeling formats alone may be insufficient to alter food choices in online settings. Future interventions should integrate motivational and educational strategies tailored to individual traits and dietary habits, rather than relying solely on calorie presentation format.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17233642
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Way Calories Are Displayed on Restaurant Menus May Not Affect Calorie Intake: Evidence from an Online Experiment

Guido Garavelli, Michele Ricci, Luisa Torri, Federica Zoe Ricci et al.
Nutrients
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

The Way Calories Are Displayed on Restaurant Menus May Not Affect Calorie Intake: Evidence from an Online Experiment

Guido Garavelli, Michele Ricci, Luisa Torri, Federica Zoe Ricci, Riccardo Migliavada
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Menu calorie labeling policies aim to promote healthier eating habits, yet their effectiveness remains debated. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two alternative qualitative labeling strategies-Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) labels and Percent Daily Intake (PDI) pie charts-compared to the standard numeric calorie count mandated in several countries, since they have been proposed to enhance consumer comprehension and decision-making. <b>Methods:</b> A nationwide online survey elicited responses from N = 885 individuals living in Italy. Survey participants were randomly assigned to one of three menu conditions: (1) numeric calorie labeling only, (2) numeric calories plus PACE labels, or (3) numeric calories plus a PDI pie chart. Participants selected a three-course meal from their respective menus. Data on sociodemographic factors, dietary habits, BMI, self-assessed nutritional knowledge, and psychological traits-restrained eating (DEBQ-R) and impulsivity (SUPPS-P)-were collected. Ordinal logistic regressions assessed the impact of labeling format, gender, and nutritional knowledge on total calories ordered. <b>Results:</b> Neither PACE labels nor PDI pie charts significantly influenced total calorie selection compared to numeric calorie labels alone. No significant interactions emerged between labeling format and gender or nutritional knowledge. However, age, BMI, and dietary habits were strongly associated with calorie choices: older adults, individuals with restrictive diets, and those with higher restrained eating scores selected lower-calorie meals, while participants with higher BMI or frequent meat intake opted for more calorie-dense options. <b>Conclusions:</b> Alternative calorie labeling formats alone may be insufficient to alter food choices in online settings. Future interventions should integrate motivational and educational strategies tailored to individual traits and dietary habits, rather than relying solely on calorie presentation format.

NutrientsVol. 17(23)
University of California, Irvine (US), University of Gastronomic Sciences (IT), Irvine University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.