Cross-country life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling with evaluation of energy use, carbon emissions, and regional trade-offs

Recycling construction and demolition waste (C&DW) into recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) is a sustainable strategy to reduce resource consumption and emissions. Most life cycle assessments (LCAs) focus on a single country and region, limiting broader applicability. This study conducts a novel comparative LCA of C&DW recycling systems across six countries and regions. By evaluating energy consumption, global warming potential (GWP), and fossil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) production, significant regional differences are revealed, largely influenced by infrastructure, processing efficiency, and transport. In countries with mature recycling systems, RCA production reduces GWP by up to 97% per ton compared to natural aggregates manufacturing. Conversely, longer transport distances or inefficient operations in less developed systems can offset these benefits. While RCA generally demonstrates lower environmental impacts, its advantage is highly context-dependent. However, standardized global guidelines remain challenging due to regional disparities in waste sources and processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25387-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-country life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling with evaluation of energy use, carbon emissions, and regional trade-offs

Shu-Chien Hsu, Vahid Asghari, Xiaoyi Liu, Chi Sun Poon et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
1.01
article

Cross-country life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling with evaluation of energy use, carbon emissions, and regional trade-offs

Shu-Chien Hsu, Vahid Asghari, Xiaoyi Liu, Chi Sun Poon, Saeedeh Hosseini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recycling construction and demolition waste (C&DW) into recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) is a sustainable strategy to reduce resource consumption and emissions. Most life cycle assessments (LCAs) focus on a single country and region, limiting broader applicability. This study conducts a novel comparative LCA of C&DW recycling systems across six countries and regions. By evaluating energy consumption, global warming potential (GWP), and fossil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) production, significant regional differences are revealed, largely influenced by infrastructure, processing efficiency, and transport. In countries with mature recycling systems, RCA production reduces GWP by up to 97% per ton compared to natural aggregates manufacturing. Conversely, longer transport distances or inefficient operations in less developed systems can offset these benefits. While RCA generally demonstrates lower environmental impacts, its advantage is highly context-dependent. However, standardized global guidelines remain challenging due to regional disparities in waste sources and processing.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.