A multi-dimensional evaluation model for power enterprise procurement performance based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS integration

Power enterprises face unique procurement challenges, including grid reliability requirements, regulatory complexities, and long-term asset investment considerations that existing evaluation methods inadequately address. Traditional approaches suffer from three critical limitations: inability to handle linguistic uncertainty (consistency ratios often exceeding 0.15), failure to integrate power-specific criteria simultaneously, and lack of systematic frameworks for aggregating conflicting stakeholder objectives. This study develops a comprehensive multi-dimensional evaluation model by integrating Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS methodologies specifically tailored for power enterprise contexts. The proposed framework achieves 23% improved consistency ratios compared to traditional AHP methods while systematically addressing uncertainty in expert judgments. The model constructs a hierarchical evaluation system encompassing four primary dimensions: cost-benefit performance, quality management, supplier relationship management, and risk control. FAHP handles subjective expert judgments and linguistic uncertainties in weight determination, while TOPSIS provides robust ranking capabilities through distance-based proximity measures. Empirical validation through a large regional power enterprise case study demonstrates model effectiveness. Results show a comprehensive closeness coefficient of 0.6651, positioning the enterprise at the 73rd industry percentile with strengths in quality management and improvement opportunities in supplier relationship development. Multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis across five uncertainty sources confirms model robustness, with coefficient variations within ± 5.7% and 96.3% ranking stability. Cross-validation with three peer enterprises (closeness coefficients ranging 0.5834-0.7245) demonstrates 91.3% performance gap identification accuracy. The integrated framework provides enhanced analytical capabilities for strategic procurement decision-making and continuous improvement initiatives in power enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25042-z
Primary Topic
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-dimensional evaluation model for power enterprise procurement performance based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS integration

Yu Bao, Xiaoqing Lv, Haigang Zhao, S. N. Song
Scientific Reports
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
article

A multi-dimensional evaluation model for power enterprise procurement performance based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS integration

Yu Bao, Xiaoqing Lv, Haigang Zhao, S. N. Song
article en

Abstract

Power enterprises face unique procurement challenges, including grid reliability requirements, regulatory complexities, and long-term asset investment considerations that existing evaluation methods inadequately address. Traditional approaches suffer from three critical limitations: inability to handle linguistic uncertainty (consistency ratios often exceeding 0.15), failure to integrate power-specific criteria simultaneously, and lack of systematic frameworks for aggregating conflicting stakeholder objectives. This study develops a comprehensive multi-dimensional evaluation model by integrating Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS methodologies specifically tailored for power enterprise contexts. The proposed framework achieves 23% improved consistency ratios compared to traditional AHP methods while systematically addressing uncertainty in expert judgments. The model constructs a hierarchical evaluation system encompassing four primary dimensions: cost-benefit performance, quality management, supplier relationship management, and risk control. FAHP handles subjective expert judgments and linguistic uncertainties in weight determination, while TOPSIS provides robust ranking capabilities through distance-based proximity measures. Empirical validation through a large regional power enterprise case study demonstrates model effectiveness. Results show a comprehensive closeness coefficient of 0.6651, positioning the enterprise at the 73rd industry percentile with strengths in quality management and improvement opportunities in supplier relationship development. Multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis across five uncertainty sources confirms model robustness, with coefficient variations within ± 5.7% and 96.3% ranking stability. Cross-validation with three peer enterprises (closeness coefficients ranging 0.5834-0.7245) demonstrates 91.3% performance gap identification accuracy. The integrated framework provides enhanced analytical capabilities for strategic procurement decision-making and continuous improvement initiatives in power enterprises.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), Tianjin Research Institute of Electric Science (China) (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.