A controlled comparative study on the effect of arterial occlusion pressure on immediate sympathetic and hyperemic responses

Different levels of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) can influence microcirculatory responses and autonomic nervous system activity, potentially affecting individuals undergoing training methods that incorporate AOP, such as blood flow restriction (BFR) training. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of four distinct AOP levels on microcirculatory responses and autonomic nervous system activity-specifically investigating the relationship between post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH), hemodynamic parameters, and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics. This prospective experimental study involved 30 healthy adults who underwent standardized assessments of heart rate variability (HRV) and post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) across four arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) levels (40, 80, 100, 130%). Measurements were conducted under controlled environmental conditions and consistent body positioning, enabling an analysis of microcirculatory and autonomic responses under progressive vascular occlusion. The results showed no significant changes in resting flow across AOP levels (p = 0.847), while all other parameters-biological zero, peak hyperemia, time to peak, average NN interval, standard deviation of NN intervals, and heart rate-exhibited significant differences between AOP conditions (all p < 0.001, except low frequency to high frequency ratio p < 0.05). However, for most variables, no significant differences were observed between 100 and 130% AOP (p > 0.999), indicating a possible stabilization of physiological responses at higher occlusion pressures. This study concludes that while increasing arterial occlusion pressure significantly affects multiple physiological parameters, responses tend to stabilize between 100 and 130% AOP, suggesting a threshold beyond which further increases yield minimal additional physiological impact.Trial registration trial number ISRCTN15418049.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25132-y
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A controlled comparative study on the effect of arterial occlusion pressure on immediate sympathetic and hyperemic responses

Robert Trybulski, Jarosław Muracki, Michał Wilk, Jakub Więckowski et al.
Scientific Reports
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

A controlled comparative study on the effect of arterial occlusion pressure on immediate sympathetic and hyperemic responses

Robert Trybulski, Jarosław Muracki, Michał Wilk, Jakub Więckowski, Gracjan Olaniszyn, Fostiak Krzysztof
article en

Abstract

Different levels of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) can influence microcirculatory responses and autonomic nervous system activity, potentially affecting individuals undergoing training methods that incorporate AOP, such as blood flow restriction (BFR) training. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of four distinct AOP levels on microcirculatory responses and autonomic nervous system activity-specifically investigating the relationship between post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH), hemodynamic parameters, and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics. This prospective experimental study involved 30 healthy adults who underwent standardized assessments of heart rate variability (HRV) and post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) across four arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) levels (40, 80, 100, 130%). Measurements were conducted under controlled environmental conditions and consistent body positioning, enabling an analysis of microcirculatory and autonomic responses under progressive vascular occlusion. The results showed no significant changes in resting flow across AOP levels (p = 0.847), while all other parameters-biological zero, peak hyperemia, time to peak, average NN interval, standard deviation of NN intervals, and heart rate-exhibited significant differences between AOP conditions (all p < 0.001, except low frequency to high frequency ratio p < 0.05). However, for most variables, no significant differences were observed between 100 and 130% AOP (p > 0.999), indicating a possible stabilization of physiological responses at higher occlusion pressures. This study concludes that while increasing arterial occlusion pressure significantly affects multiple physiological parameters, responses tend to stabilize between 100 and 130% AOP, suggesting a threshold beyond which further increases yield minimal additional physiological impact.Trial registration trial number ISRCTN15418049.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Szczecin (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Górnośląska Wyższa Szkoła Handlowa im. Wojciecha Korfantego (PL), Academy of Fine Arts in Katowice (PL), Polish Wood Cluster (PL), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Raciborzu (PL), Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego im. Jerzego Kukuczki w Katowicach (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.