Bayesian Optimization-Tuned machine learning for underwater acoustic target localization

Underwater acoustic target localization (UATL) is challenging but has achieved some success with limitations. For example, matched field processing (MFP) is sensitive to environmental noise and inefficient in processing large-scale data, making real-time with accurate performance difficult. This paper presents a Bayesian optimization-tuned machine learning approach for UATL and conducts comparative studies with MFP and other parameter tuning methods. The environment used is from the seatrial conducted on October 26, 1993, in the shallow sea area north of Elba Island. First, the simulated training data is generated by the KRAKEN propagation code on grids of ranges and depths. Second, MFP and two machine learning methods (k-nearest neighbor, support vector regression) with distinct hyperparameter optimization approaches are employed for localization. The results show that the machine learning approaches achieve higher localization accuracy than MFP, identifying the underwater target located at a 5.6 km range (error < 0.1 km) and 79 m depth (error < 0.5 m), while Bayesian optimization proves more efficient than alternative tuning methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Optimization-Tuned machine learning for underwater acoustic target localization

Peter Gerstoft, Shi Jian, Qiankun Yu, Wen Zhang et al.
1 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Underwater Acoustics Research
1.79
article

Bayesian Optimization-Tuned machine learning for underwater acoustic target localization

Peter Gerstoft, Shi Jian, Qiankun Yu, Wen Zhang, Haiqiang Niu, Zhefeng Meng, Yan Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Underwater acoustic target localization (UATL) is challenging but has achieved some success with limitations. For example, matched field processing (MFP) is sensitive to environmental noise and inefficient in processing large-scale data, making real-time with accurate performance difficult. This paper presents a Bayesian optimization-tuned machine learning approach for UATL and conducts comparative studies with MFP and other parameter tuning methods. The environment used is from the seatrial conducted on October 26, 1993, in the shallow sea area north of Elba Island. First, the simulated training data is generated by the KRAKEN propagation code on grids of ranges and depths. Second, MFP and two machine learning methods (k-nearest neighbor, support vector regression) with distinct hyperparameter optimization approaches are employed for localization. The results show that the machine learning approaches achieve higher localization accuracy than MFP, identifying the underwater target located at a 5.6 km range (error < 0.1 km) and 79 m depth (error < 0.5 m), while Bayesian optimization proves more efficient than alternative tuning methods.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 158(5)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), National University of Defense Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Acoustics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Underwater Acoustics Research
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bayesian Optimization-Tuned machine learning for underwater acoustic target localization — Peter Gerstoft, Shi Jian, et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS