Bayesian Estimation of Extreme Quantiles and the Distribution of Exceedances for Measuring Tail Risk

Estimating extreme quantiles and the number of future exceedances is an important task in financial risk management. More important than estimating the quantile itself is to insure zero coverage error, which implies the quantile estimate should, on average, reflect the desired probability of exceedance. In this research, we show that for unconditional distributions isomorphic to the exponential, a Bayesian quantile estimate results in zero coverage error. This compares to the traditional maximum likelihood method, where the coverage error can be significant under small sample sizes even though the quantile estimate is unbiased. More generally, we prove a sufficient condition for an unbiased quantile estimator to result in coverage error and we show our result holds by virtue of using a Jeffreys prior for the unknown parameters and is independent of the true prior. We derive a new, predictive distribution, and the moments, for the number of quantile exceedances, and highlight its superior performance. We extend our results to the conditional tail of distributions with asymptotic Paretian tails and, in particular, those in the Fréchet maximum domain of attraction which are typically encountered in finance. We illustrate our results using simulations for a variety of light and heavy-tailed distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18120659
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Estimation of Extreme Quantiles and the Distribution of Exceedances for Measuring Tail Risk

Douglas E. Johnston
1 citations
Journal of risk and financial management
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
2.21
article

Bayesian Estimation of Extreme Quantiles and the Distribution of Exceedances for Measuring Tail Risk

Douglas E. Johnston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Estimating extreme quantiles and the number of future exceedances is an important task in financial risk management. More important than estimating the quantile itself is to insure zero coverage error, which implies the quantile estimate should, on average, reflect the desired probability of exceedance. In this research, we show that for unconditional distributions isomorphic to the exponential, a Bayesian quantile estimate results in zero coverage error. This compares to the traditional maximum likelihood method, where the coverage error can be significant under small sample sizes even though the quantile estimate is unbiased. More generally, we prove a sufficient condition for an unbiased quantile estimator to result in coverage error and we show our result holds by virtue of using a Jeffreys prior for the unknown parameters and is independent of the true prior. We derive a new, predictive distribution, and the moments, for the number of quantile exceedances, and highlight its superior performance. We extend our results to the conditional tail of distributions with asymptotic Paretian tails and, in particular, those in the Fréchet maximum domain of attraction which are typically encountered in finance. We illustrate our results using simulations for a variety of light and heavy-tailed distributions.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 18(12)
Farmingdale State College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.