Arthroscopic All-Suture Anchor Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Without a Posteromedial Portal: Clinical Improvement and Healing Despite Persistent Extrusion

<b>Background:</b> It is known that meniscus root tears affect the biomechanics of the knee in a way that is equivalent to a total meniscectomy. Therefore, repair is increasingly favored for meniscal root tears. In our study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of meniscal root repairs with suture anchors. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Patients who had undergone surgery for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) using suture-anchors between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were excluded if they had a previous infection, a fracture and an operation on the same knee, or osteoarthritis and a follow-up period under one year. The MMPRTs were classified according to the LaPrade classification system. For the functional classification, the range of motion (ROM), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form were used for the postoperative functional assessments. The radiological assessment was performed by measuring the medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and evaluating the signal changes in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee, which was recorded during the last follow-up examination. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-two patients (6M/26F) were included in the study. The mean age was 49.9 ± 5.4 years old, and the follow-up period was 29.6 ± 24.1 months. The LKS improved from 53.7 ± 6.9 to 83.6 ± 5.2 and the IKDC improved from 46.1 ± 6.9 to 83.0 ± 5.5 at the final follow-up control (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). The VAS score decreased from 8.4 ± 0.5 to 2.5 ± 0.9 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The MRI scan of the knee performed at the last follow-up examination showed no improvement in only one patient. While the MME before surgery was 5.0 ± 2.1 mm, it was 4.6 ± 2.1 mm at the last follow-up examination (<i>p</i> = 0.178). An increase in the Kellgren-Lawrence stage was observed in 4 of our patients (from stage 1 to stage 2 in one patient, from stage 0 to stage 1 in 3 patients). <b>Conclusions:</b> The results of this study suggest that repairing MMPRTs using suture-anchors is a valid solution for treatment and prevention in patients with poor prognoses in order to achieve positive results in reducing pain, restoring mobility, improving functional outcomes and avoiding a significant increase in progression to arthrosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238272
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arthroscopic All-Suture Anchor Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Without a Posteromedial Portal: Clinical Improvement and Healing Despite Persistent Extrusion

Taner Güneş, Murat Aşçı, Utkan Sobay, Mete Gedikbaş et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Arthroscopic All-Suture Anchor Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Without a Posteromedial Portal: Clinical Improvement and Healing Despite Persistent Extrusion

Taner Güneş, Murat Aşçı, Utkan Sobay, Mete Gedikbaş, Fırat Erpala, Yavuz Şahbat
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> It is known that meniscus root tears affect the biomechanics of the knee in a way that is equivalent to a total meniscectomy. Therefore, repair is increasingly favored for meniscal root tears. In our study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of meniscal root repairs with suture anchors. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Patients who had undergone surgery for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) using suture-anchors between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were excluded if they had a previous infection, a fracture and an operation on the same knee, or osteoarthritis and a follow-up period under one year. The MMPRTs were classified according to the LaPrade classification system. For the functional classification, the range of motion (ROM), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form were used for the postoperative functional assessments. The radiological assessment was performed by measuring the medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and evaluating the signal changes in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee, which was recorded during the last follow-up examination. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-two patients (6M/26F) were included in the study. The mean age was 49.9 ± 5.4 years old, and the follow-up period was 29.6 ± 24.1 months. The LKS improved from 53.7 ± 6.9 to 83.6 ± 5.2 and the IKDC improved from 46.1 ± 6.9 to 83.0 ± 5.5 at the final follow-up control (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). The VAS score decreased from 8.4 ± 0.5 to 2.5 ± 0.9 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The MRI scan of the knee performed at the last follow-up examination showed no improvement in only one patient. While the MME before surgery was 5.0 ± 2.1 mm, it was 4.6 ± 2.1 mm at the last follow-up examination (<i>p</i> = 0.178). An increase in the Kellgren-Lawrence stage was observed in 4 of our patients (from stage 1 to stage 2 in one patient, from stage 0 to stage 1 in 3 patients). <b>Conclusions:</b> The results of this study suggest that repairing MMPRTs using suture-anchors is a valid solution for treatment and prevention in patients with poor prognoses in order to achieve positive results in reducing pain, restoring mobility, improving functional outcomes and avoiding a significant increase in progression to arthrosis.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(23)
Bahçeşehir University (TR), Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR), State Hospital (GB), Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Hastanesi (TR), Eskişehir City Hospital (TR), Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.