Machine Learning to Improve Buckling Predictions for Structural Optimization of Stiffened Structures

Buckling is a key failure mode in aircraft structural design. Full wingbox buckling analyses are expensive to include in structural optimizations, so closed-form buckling predictions at the panel level are often used. However, these closed-form solutions are limited to special cases that are analytic, such as simply supported boundary conditions, thin-walled panels, and high aspect ratios for shear buckling. To improve buckling predictions while maintaining computational efficiency for structural optimization, the authors propose the use of machine learning to augment closed-form solutions. Their machine learning models are trained on finite element datasets of stiffened panel buckling with nondimensional parameters informed by closed-form solutions. The authors identify a log transform linear asymptote property from the closed-form buckling solutions. This property is included in the Gaussian process (GP) models to improve model extrapolation for low-aspect-ratio and highly stiffened designs. The custom GP model achieves a 99% [Formula: see text] value for extrapolated data as compared to the closed form and provides accurate buckling predictions on a finite element dataset of mixed simply supported to clamped panels. With the mixed boundary condition dataset, potential weight savings are demonstrated of 3.12 and 11.7% on a subsonic wingbox and a supersonic wingbox, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j065925
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning to Improve Buckling Predictions for Structural Optimization of Stiffened Structures

Sean P. Engelstad, Brian J. Burke, Graeme Kennedy
AIAA Journal
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Machine Learning to Improve Buckling Predictions for Structural Optimization of Stiffened Structures

Sean P. Engelstad, Brian J. Burke, Graeme Kennedy
article en

Abstract

Buckling is a key failure mode in aircraft structural design. Full wingbox buckling analyses are expensive to include in structural optimizations, so closed-form buckling predictions at the panel level are often used. However, these closed-form solutions are limited to special cases that are analytic, such as simply supported boundary conditions, thin-walled panels, and high aspect ratios for shear buckling. To improve buckling predictions while maintaining computational efficiency for structural optimization, the authors propose the use of machine learning to augment closed-form solutions. Their machine learning models are trained on finite element datasets of stiffened panel buckling with nondimensional parameters informed by closed-form solutions. The authors identify a log transform linear asymptote property from the closed-form buckling solutions. This property is included in the Gaussian process (GP) models to improve model extrapolation for low-aspect-ratio and highly stiffened designs. The custom GP model achieves a 99% [Formula: see text] value for extrapolated data as compared to the closed form and provides accurate buckling predictions on a finite element dataset of mixed simply supported to clamped panels. With the mixed boundary condition dataset, potential weight savings are demonstrated of 3.12 and 11.7% on a subsonic wingbox and a supersonic wingbox, respectively.

AIAA JournalVol. 64(3)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.