PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer assessed with antibodies 28-8 and 22C3

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has emerged as a key biomarker in determining both the progression and prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). Consequently, its detection through immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis is essential for guiding appropriate treatment selection. We conducted an analytical, observational study based on a five-year retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer at a comprehensive oncology center in Colombia. All patients underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess PD-L1 expression and calculate the Combined Positive Score (CPS). The objective of this study was to compare the positivity detection rates between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays and to evaluate the concordance between them. A descriptive analysis of clinical and pathological variables was performed. Univariate analysis was used to determine the frequency of PD-L1 expression and CPS distribution. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied and stratified by PD-L1 status. Concordance between the two assays was assessed using the kappa (κ) index. A total of 175 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) and tested for PD-L1 expression were included in the study. Complete pathological and IHC data were available for 155 patients. Among them, 39.4% were tested with the 28-8 assay, and 60.6% with the 22C3 assay. PD-L1 positivity was observed in 34.4% of cases using the 28-8 assay and in 28.7% using the 22C3 assay. Among patients with available follow-up data (n = 34), PD-L1 testing was performed using the 22C3 clone, with a positivity rate of 35.3%. In the subgroup analysis of patients tested with both antibodies (n = 20), 60% were PD-L1 positive. Within this subset, 25% had a CPS of 1-4, 16.7% had a CPS of 5-9, and 58.3% had a CPS ≥ 10. For the 22C3 assay specifically, PD-L1 positivity was observed in 40% of cases, with 37.5% having a CPS of 1-4 and 62.5% a CPS ≥ 10; notably, no cases in this group had a CPS of 5-9. The concordance rate between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays was 61%, as measured by the kappa index. The 28-8 clone identified a higher proportion of patients with PD-L1 expression compared to the 22C3 antibody. However, both assays demonstrated a concordance rate of 61%. In the study population, the subgroup with a Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 10 was the most prevalent, suggesting that high PD-L1 expression is relatively common and potentially clinically relevant in this cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25055-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer assessed with antibodies 28-8 and 22C3

Erick Cantor, Henry Vargas, Rocío López, Iván Triana et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
1.05
article

PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer assessed with antibodies 28-8 and 22C3

Erick Cantor, Henry Vargas, Rocío López, Iván Triana, Javier Segovia, Luís Pino, John Alejandro Murillo Silva, Andres Felipe Bejarano, Laura Chacón Zambrano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has emerged as a key biomarker in determining both the progression and prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). Consequently, its detection through immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis is essential for guiding appropriate treatment selection. We conducted an analytical, observational study based on a five-year retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer at a comprehensive oncology center in Colombia. All patients underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess PD-L1 expression and calculate the Combined Positive Score (CPS). The objective of this study was to compare the positivity detection rates between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays and to evaluate the concordance between them. A descriptive analysis of clinical and pathological variables was performed. Univariate analysis was used to determine the frequency of PD-L1 expression and CPS distribution. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied and stratified by PD-L1 status. Concordance between the two assays was assessed using the kappa (κ) index. A total of 175 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) and tested for PD-L1 expression were included in the study. Complete pathological and IHC data were available for 155 patients. Among them, 39.4% were tested with the 28-8 assay, and 60.6% with the 22C3 assay. PD-L1 positivity was observed in 34.4% of cases using the 28-8 assay and in 28.7% using the 22C3 assay. Among patients with available follow-up data (n = 34), PD-L1 testing was performed using the 22C3 clone, with a positivity rate of 35.3%. In the subgroup analysis of patients tested with both antibodies (n = 20), 60% were PD-L1 positive. Within this subset, 25% had a CPS of 1-4, 16.7% had a CPS of 5-9, and 58.3% had a CPS ≥ 10. For the 22C3 assay specifically, PD-L1 positivity was observed in 40% of cases, with 37.5% having a CPS of 1-4 and 62.5% a CPS ≥ 10; notably, no cases in this group had a CPS of 5-9. The concordance rate between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays was 61%, as measured by the kappa index. The 28-8 clone identified a higher proportion of patients with PD-L1 expression compared to the 22C3 antibody. However, both assays demonstrated a concordance rate of 61%. In the study population, the subgroup with a Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 10 was the most prevalent, suggesting that high PD-L1 expression is relatively common and potentially clinically relevant in this cohort.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (CO)
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.