Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Road Construction and Operation: Evaluating Environmental Sustainability

This study applies the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of different types of road construction, including at-grade sections, trenches, embankments, viaducts, and tunnels. The functional unit used is 100 m, and system boundaries consider raw material extraction, transport, construction, and operation based on a 30-year lifetime. Impact categories considered are Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP), and Human Toxicity Potential (HTP). Results show that tunnels generate the highest impacts during construction, particularly in terms of CO2eq and SO2eq, while operational impacts remain similar across all road types. A valuable consideration can be made on the “emissions equivalence” observed when the length of the at-grade road is approximately twice that of the tunnel, enhancing the importance of a “full view” of the impacts. In exploring mitigation strategies, the use of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration as an alternative material reduced GWP-related emissions by about 50%. While the existing literature tends to focus on individual types of infrastructure or specific materials, the following work proposes a systemic approach that links design choices to circular economy strategies, quantitatively demonstrating the potential for reducing environmental impacts using secondary materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310438
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Road Construction and Operation: Evaluating Environmental Sustainability

Valerio Veraldi, M Di Prete, Paolo Viotti, Fabio Tatti et al.
Sustainability
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Road Construction and Operation: Evaluating Environmental Sustainability

Valerio Veraldi, M Di Prete, Paolo Viotti, Fabio Tatti, Lavinia Croce, Stefano Terralavoro
article en

Abstract

This study applies the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of different types of road construction, including at-grade sections, trenches, embankments, viaducts, and tunnels. The functional unit used is 100 m, and system boundaries consider raw material extraction, transport, construction, and operation based on a 30-year lifetime. Impact categories considered are Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP), and Human Toxicity Potential (HTP). Results show that tunnels generate the highest impacts during construction, particularly in terms of CO2eq and SO2eq, while operational impacts remain similar across all road types. A valuable consideration can be made on the “emissions equivalence” observed when the length of the at-grade road is approximately twice that of the tunnel, enhancing the importance of a “full view” of the impacts. In exploring mitigation strategies, the use of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration as an alternative material reduced GWP-related emissions by about 50%. While the existing literature tends to focus on individual types of infrastructure or specific materials, the following work proposes a systemic approach that links design choices to circular economy strategies, quantitatively demonstrating the potential for reducing environmental impacts using secondary materials.

SustainabilityVol. 17(23)
Ospedale San Giacomo Apostolo (IT), Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.