Investment incentives in contests

Abstract Competition among rivals is often modeled as a contest in which the probability of winning is increasing in own effort. We consider incentives for players to attempt to influence their winning chances by undertaking a pre-contest investment. Investment costs are private information, and the outcome is stochastic. We characterize equilibrium by a threshold of the cost parameter that determines investment, and delineate cases where all players invest and when only some do. We consider how the attractiveness of the investment prospect impacts the investment decision and expected contest effort. In particular, the probability of investment success has an interesting non-monotonic effect on investment behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01643-5
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment incentives in contests

Tapas Kundu, Johann Reindl, Derek J. Clark
Social Choice and Welfare
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Investment incentives in contests

Tapas Kundu, Johann Reindl, Derek J. Clark
article en

Abstract

Abstract Competition among rivals is often modeled as a contest in which the probability of winning is increasing in own effort. We consider incentives for players to attempt to influence their winning chances by undertaking a pre-contest investment. Investment costs are private information, and the outcome is stochastic. We characterize equilibrium by a threshold of the cost parameter that determines investment, and delineate cases where all players invest and when only some do. We consider how the attractiveness of the investment prospect impacts the investment decision and expected contest effort. In particular, the probability of investment success has an interesting non-monotonic effect on investment behavior.

Social Choice and Welfare
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.