Effect of Eight Weeks of in Season Training with Wearable Resistance Attached to the Forearm on Spike Velocity in Female Volleyball Players

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of eight weeks of in-season training with wearable resistance attached to the forearm on spike velocity in female volleyball players. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 13 senior female volleyball players belonging to the same team (age 23.5 ± 3.2 years, body mass 66.8 ± 6.9 kg, and height 174.7 ± 5.8 cm) participated and were divided into an experimental group (<i>n</i> = 7) or a control group (<i>n</i> = 6). Both groups participated in the same training sessions, but the experimental group trained with wearable resistance attached to the forearm, while the control group wore wearable resistance on the calf during the training sessions. Before and after an eight-week training period, spike velocity was tested. <b>Results:</b> The main findings were that spike velocity did not increase in either group, which was contrary to our hypothesis. In fact, neither the forearm-loaded experimental group nor the calf-loaded control group showed any performance improvement; instead, both groups demonstrated small, non-significant declines in spike velocity over the 8-week period (on average, about 2.1% in both groups). These outcomes occurred with high individual variability, with no significant difference between the groups (time × group: <i>F</i>(1, 11) = 0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.929). The between-group contrast was trivial, reinforcing that the forearm-loading intervention offered no clear benefit over normal training in practical terms. <b>Conclusions:</b> Taken at face value, this protocol does not support using wearable resistance during the competitive season to enhance spike velocity. It may be that off-season or individualized-load protocols could elicit more positive effects when overall training and fatigue levels are better controlled.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040458
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Eight Weeks of in Season Training with Wearable Resistance Attached to the Forearm on Spike Velocity in Female Volleyball Players

Roland van den Tillaar, Per Lunde, Wojciech Grzyb, Milosz Mielniczek
1 citations
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Effect of Eight Weeks of in Season Training with Wearable Resistance Attached to the Forearm on Spike Velocity in Female Volleyball Players

Roland van den Tillaar, Per Lunde, Wojciech Grzyb, Milosz Mielniczek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of eight weeks of in-season training with wearable resistance attached to the forearm on spike velocity in female volleyball players. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 13 senior female volleyball players belonging to the same team (age 23.5 ± 3.2 years, body mass 66.8 ± 6.9 kg, and height 174.7 ± 5.8 cm) participated and were divided into an experimental group (<i>n</i> = 7) or a control group (<i>n</i> = 6). Both groups participated in the same training sessions, but the experimental group trained with wearable resistance attached to the forearm, while the control group wore wearable resistance on the calf during the training sessions. Before and after an eight-week training period, spike velocity was tested. <b>Results:</b> The main findings were that spike velocity did not increase in either group, which was contrary to our hypothesis. In fact, neither the forearm-loaded experimental group nor the calf-loaded control group showed any performance improvement; instead, both groups demonstrated small, non-significant declines in spike velocity over the 8-week period (on average, about 2.1% in both groups). These outcomes occurred with high individual variability, with no significant difference between the groups (time × group: <i>F</i>(1, 11) = 0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.929). The between-group contrast was trivial, reinforcing that the forearm-loading intervention offered no clear benefit over normal training in practical terms. <b>Conclusions:</b> Taken at face value, this protocol does not support using wearable resistance during the competitive season to enhance spike velocity. It may be that off-season or individualized-load protocols could elicit more positive effects when overall training and fatigue levels are better controlled.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(4)
Nord University (NO), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.