Periapical Lesion Healing After Retreatment and Root Canal Filling with a Bioceramic-Based Sealer: A Randomized Clinical Study with 1-Year Follow-Up

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The clinical outcome of root canal treatments using calcium silicate-based sealer (CSBS) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year effect of CSBS in combination with a single-cone obturation technique on periapical lesion (PL) healing evaluated on cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) after single-visit root canal retreatment. <b>Methods</b>: This randomized clinical study involved 50 patients with chronic apical periodontitis and previous root canal treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04072926). The inclusion criteria were previous endodontic treatment, asymptomatic inadequate endodontic treatment, PLs measuring > 5 mm, and percussion and palpation sensitivity. The exclusion criteria were immunocompromised status, pregnancy, periodontally compromised teeth, vertical root fracture, and antibiotic usage in the last month. Single-visit root canal retreatment was performed by the same endodontist. The patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the root canal sealer used: CSBS (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (ERBS) (AH Plus). Periapical healing, as the primary outcome measure, was determined according to the reduction in PL volume on CBCT from the preoperative period to the 1-year postoperative period. <b>Results:</b> Pre- and postoperative PL volumes (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were not significantly different between the CSBS and ERBS groups. The success rate (loose criteria) was 82.9% in the ERBS group and 94.7% in CSBS group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Root canal retreatment outcomes of CSBS, including periapical healing, are comparable to those of ERBS at 1 year after the retreatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238267
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Periapical Lesion Healing After Retreatment and Root Canal Filling with a Bioceramic-Based Sealer: A Randomized Clinical Study with 1-Year Follow-Up

Tomislav Lauc, Gabrijela Kapetanović Petričević, Dragana Gabrić, Ivona Bago et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
1.79
article

Periapical Lesion Healing After Retreatment and Root Canal Filling with a Bioceramic-Based Sealer: A Randomized Clinical Study with 1-Year Follow-Up

Tomislav Lauc, Gabrijela Kapetanović Petričević, Dragana Gabrić, Ivona Bago, Boris Pažin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The clinical outcome of root canal treatments using calcium silicate-based sealer (CSBS) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year effect of CSBS in combination with a single-cone obturation technique on periapical lesion (PL) healing evaluated on cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) after single-visit root canal retreatment. <b>Methods</b>: This randomized clinical study involved 50 patients with chronic apical periodontitis and previous root canal treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04072926). The inclusion criteria were previous endodontic treatment, asymptomatic inadequate endodontic treatment, PLs measuring > 5 mm, and percussion and palpation sensitivity. The exclusion criteria were immunocompromised status, pregnancy, periodontally compromised teeth, vertical root fracture, and antibiotic usage in the last month. Single-visit root canal retreatment was performed by the same endodontist. The patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the root canal sealer used: CSBS (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (ERBS) (AH Plus). Periapical healing, as the primary outcome measure, was determined according to the reduction in PL volume on CBCT from the preoperative period to the 1-year postoperative period. <b>Results:</b> Pre- and postoperative PL volumes (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were not significantly different between the CSBS and ERBS groups. The success rate (loose criteria) was 82.9% in the ERBS group and 94.7% in CSBS group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Root canal retreatment outcomes of CSBS, including periapical healing, are comparable to those of ERBS at 1 year after the retreatment.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(23)
University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), University of Zagreb (HR), Policijska akademija (HR)
Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.