Sephardim versus Ashkenazim in Byzantine-Ottoman and Eastern European Karaite Sources: An Interconfessional Perspective

Abstract: Whereas Rabbanite Jews tended to portray the Karaites as a homogeneous group of heretics, Karaite authors from the late Byzantine and the early Ottoman period distinguished between Sephardim and Ashkenazim. These distinctions appear in Karaite exegetical, legal, and kabbalistic texts. Karaite scholars presented a positive image of the Sephardim as representatives of a nontalmudic Judaism, preferring to borrow Sephardic intellectual patterns and cultural legacy while largely rejecting Ashkenazic ones. This article traces the distinct images of Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the texts of Karaite authors in Byzantium and eastern Europe, as well as their attitudes toward the scholarship of these two Rabbanite groups. It further explores the extent to which the distinction between these groups stemmed from certain historical developments in Karaite and Spanish scholarship, from theological polemics between Karaites and Rabbanites, or possibly from cultural and social factors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2025.a974635
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sephardim versus Ashkenazim in Byzantine-Ottoman and Eastern European Karaite Sources: An Interconfessional Perspective

Golda Akhiezer
AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Sephardim versus Ashkenazim in Byzantine-Ottoman and Eastern European Karaite Sources: An Interconfessional Perspective

Golda Akhiezer
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Whereas Rabbanite Jews tended to portray the Karaites as a homogeneous group of heretics, Karaite authors from the late Byzantine and the early Ottoman period distinguished between Sephardim and Ashkenazim. These distinctions appear in Karaite exegetical, legal, and kabbalistic texts. Karaite scholars presented a positive image of the Sephardim as representatives of a nontalmudic Judaism, preferring to borrow Sephardic intellectual patterns and cultural legacy while largely rejecting Ashkenazic ones. This article traces the distinct images of Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the texts of Karaite authors in Byzantium and eastern Europe, as well as their attitudes toward the scholarship of these two Rabbanite groups. It further explores the extent to which the distinction between these groups stemmed from certain historical developments in Karaite and Spanish scholarship, from theological polemics between Karaites and Rabbanites, or possibly from cultural and social factors.

AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish StudiesVol. 49(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sephardim versus Ashkenazim in Byzantine-Ottoman and Eastern European Karaite Sources: An Interconfessional Perspective — Golda Akhiezer · AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS