Modernity's Demons: Joseph Soloveitchik's Critique of Instrumental Reason

Abstract: This essay argues that Joseph Soloveitchik maintained an instrumental conception of reason, and, in later texts, a critique thereof. After brief reference to the work of Horkheimer and Adorno, the paper lays out Soloveitchik's ambivalence around reason, identifying it as the image of God and as a source of evil. Reason, Soloveitchik argues, is technological, aimed at understanding only in order to dominate. Conquering nature through reason allows humanity to overcome nature and attain dignity. However, when directed toward other subjects, reason becomes oppression. Soloveitchik is also concerned to provide the conditions of possibility for the ethical use of instrumental reason. Reason, Soloveitchik says, must recognize its limits. Reason can achieve its ends, but it cannot choose those ends. It cannot determine moral norms. Finally, the subject must restrain oneself in the face of another subject, recognizing the irreducible difference which leaves the Other forever outside their own comprehension.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2025.a974643
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modernity's Demons: Joseph Soloveitchik's Critique of Instrumental Reason

Levi Morrow
AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

Modernity's Demons: Joseph Soloveitchik's Critique of Instrumental Reason

Levi Morrow
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay argues that Joseph Soloveitchik maintained an instrumental conception of reason, and, in later texts, a critique thereof. After brief reference to the work of Horkheimer and Adorno, the paper lays out Soloveitchik's ambivalence around reason, identifying it as the image of God and as a source of evil. Reason, Soloveitchik argues, is technological, aimed at understanding only in order to dominate. Conquering nature through reason allows humanity to overcome nature and attain dignity. However, when directed toward other subjects, reason becomes oppression. Soloveitchik is also concerned to provide the conditions of possibility for the ethical use of instrumental reason. Reason, Soloveitchik says, must recognize its limits. Reason can achieve its ends, but it cannot choose those ends. It cannot determine moral norms. Finally, the subject must restrain oneself in the face of another subject, recognizing the irreducible difference which leaves the Other forever outside their own comprehension.

AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish StudiesVol. 49(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.