“True” Manliness and Adoptive Fatherhood in Dinah Mulock Craik’s A Noble Life (1866)

Abstract: In A Noble Life (1866), Dinah Mulock Craik conforms to mid-nineteenth-century depictions of men with disabilities as “unmarriageable” yet also explores the ways in which disabled male characters can reclaim some of the power that their exclusion from the marriage plot costs them. Narratives depicting male characters with disabilities as adoptive fathers not only partially alleviate eugenic fears about the transmission of disability but also enable these characters to qualify for masculine status. The similarities that men with disabilities and adopted displaced children shared in the Victorian imagination have not been closely examined. Like men with disabilities, displaced children were simultaneously considered objects of pity as well as possible social threats, likely to perpetuate the immorality thought to have been inherited from their indigent or criminal parents. Yet, ironically, in A Noble Life , Craik’s pairing of two eugenically suspect groups becomes integral to how the author attempts to alleviate concerns about genetically transmitted “taints.” Adoption is depicted not only as a way to evade the perceived adverse reproductive potential of the disabled male protagonist but also as a means of saving the adopted child from their inherited “moral depravity.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in the novel
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2025.a975690
Primary Topic
Decadence, Literature, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“True” Manliness and Adoptive Fatherhood in Dinah Mulock Craik’s A Noble Life (1866)

Maryssa Grayer
Studies in the novel
Decadence, Literature, and Society
article

“True” Manliness and Adoptive Fatherhood in Dinah Mulock Craik’s A Noble Life (1866)

Maryssa Grayer
article en

Abstract

Abstract: In A Noble Life (1866), Dinah Mulock Craik conforms to mid-nineteenth-century depictions of men with disabilities as “unmarriageable” yet also explores the ways in which disabled male characters can reclaim some of the power that their exclusion from the marriage plot costs them. Narratives depicting male characters with disabilities as adoptive fathers not only partially alleviate eugenic fears about the transmission of disability but also enable these characters to qualify for masculine status. The similarities that men with disabilities and adopted displaced children shared in the Victorian imagination have not been closely examined. Like men with disabilities, displaced children were simultaneously considered objects of pity as well as possible social threats, likely to perpetuate the immorality thought to have been inherited from their indigent or criminal parents. Yet, ironically, in A Noble Life , Craik’s pairing of two eugenically suspect groups becomes integral to how the author attempts to alleviate concerns about genetically transmitted “taints.” Adoption is depicted not only as a way to evade the perceived adverse reproductive potential of the disabled male protagonist but also as a means of saving the adopted child from their inherited “moral depravity.”

Studies in the novelVol. 57(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Decadence, Literature, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“True” Manliness and Adoptive Fatherhood in Dinah Mulock Craik’s A Noble Life (1866) — Maryssa Grayer · Studies in the novel (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS