Policy Inaction Risks Breaching the 2°C Climate Target

Despite repeated increases in national climate pledges since the Paris Agreement, a significant gap remains between collective ambition and the action required to meet its temperature goals. Integrating these pledges with global models, we show that full implementation would still lead to approximately 1.7°C of warming, missing the 1.5°C target. When considering ongoing policy inaction, a cumulative shortfall of 505 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e in anticipated mitigation is expected, and this warming increases by nearly 0.3°C, drastically narrowing the window to stay below 2.0°C. Our analysis reveals a critical disparity on a regional level: High-income nations are often meeting modest targets, while low-income countries face capacity constraints in delivering ambitious pledges. This imbalance underscores that persistent inequities in responsibility and resources are undermining global climate effectiveness. Closing the ambition-credibility gap urgently requires enhanced international cooperation and support to ensure a viable pathway for all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70614
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Inaction Risks Breaching the 2°C Climate Target

Xiaopeng Deng, Zhangcai Qin, Hui Xie, Son Hwi Kim et al.
Global Change Biology
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Policy Inaction Risks Breaching the 2°C Climate Target

Xiaopeng Deng, Zhangcai Qin, Hui Xie, Son Hwi Kim, Wenjie Dong, Yao Huang, Min Chen, Wenping Yuan
article en

Abstract

Despite repeated increases in national climate pledges since the Paris Agreement, a significant gap remains between collective ambition and the action required to meet its temperature goals. Integrating these pledges with global models, we show that full implementation would still lead to approximately 1.7°C of warming, missing the 1.5°C target. When considering ongoing policy inaction, a cumulative shortfall of 505 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e in anticipated mitigation is expected, and this warming increases by nearly 0.3°C, drastically narrowing the window to stay below 2.0°C. Our analysis reveals a critical disparity on a regional level: High-income nations are often meeting modest targets, while low-income countries face capacity constraints in delivering ambitious pledges. This imbalance underscores that persistent inequities in responsibility and resources are undermining global climate effectiveness. Closing the ambition-credibility gap urgently requires enhanced international cooperation and support to ensure a viable pathway for all.

Global Change BiologyVol. 31(11)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Ministry of Education (BN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.