Biomechanical Compensation Patterns Across Different Phases of Side-Cutting Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

(1) Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) alters lower-limb biomechanics. While gait and running are well-studied, the multi-phase side-cutting remains poorly understood, particularly regarding phase-specific adaptations after ACLR. (2) Methods: Thirty-four patients (19 male, 15 female) at nine months post-ACLR participated. Biomechanical data during side-cutting were collected using synchronized motion capture and force platforms. Knee joint kinematics and kinetics were analyzed over three phases: initial contact-deceleration, stance pivot, and push-off. (3) Results: During the initial contact-deceleration, the reconstructed limb exhibited greater knee external rotation at the first posterior ground reaction force (pGRF) peak (8.5° vs. 6.3°, <i>p</i> = 0.021), and reduced knee flexion (43.2° vs. 47.3°, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with a lower extension moment at the second pGRF peak (0.10 vs. 0.14 BW·BH; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The stance pivot phase was marked by significantly lower knee flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.001), extension moment (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and medial/vertical GRFs on the reconstructed side (0.49 vs. 0.52 BW, <i>p</i> = 0.029; 1.98 vs. 2.10 BW, <i>p</i> = 0.012). During the push-off, the involved limb demonstrated a significantly lower extension moment (0.008 vs. 0.014 BW·BH, <i>p</i> = 0.037) and anterior GRF (0.20 vs. 0.23 BW, <i>p</i> = 0.010). (4) Conclusions: This study proposes a three-phase compensation model for side-cutting: "rotational instability" at initial contact, "protective unloading" during the stance pivot phase, and "force-generation deficit" at push-off. This three-phase framework provides a new paradigm for evaluating dynamic knee function after ACLR and guiding phase-specific rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12121280
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Compensation Patterns Across Different Phases of Side-Cutting Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Mingxuan Gao, Xueling Ge, Ying-fang Ao, Yiming Tao et al.
Bioengineering
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Biomechanical Compensation Patterns Across Different Phases of Side-Cutting Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Mingxuan Gao, Xueling Ge, Ying-fang Ao, Yiming Tao, Lai Suo, Shuang Ren
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) alters lower-limb biomechanics. While gait and running are well-studied, the multi-phase side-cutting remains poorly understood, particularly regarding phase-specific adaptations after ACLR. (2) Methods: Thirty-four patients (19 male, 15 female) at nine months post-ACLR participated. Biomechanical data during side-cutting were collected using synchronized motion capture and force platforms. Knee joint kinematics and kinetics were analyzed over three phases: initial contact-deceleration, stance pivot, and push-off. (3) Results: During the initial contact-deceleration, the reconstructed limb exhibited greater knee external rotation at the first posterior ground reaction force (pGRF) peak (8.5° vs. 6.3°, <i>p</i> = 0.021), and reduced knee flexion (43.2° vs. 47.3°, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with a lower extension moment at the second pGRF peak (0.10 vs. 0.14 BW·BH; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The stance pivot phase was marked by significantly lower knee flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.001), extension moment (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and medial/vertical GRFs on the reconstructed side (0.49 vs. 0.52 BW, <i>p</i> = 0.029; 1.98 vs. 2.10 BW, <i>p</i> = 0.012). During the push-off, the involved limb demonstrated a significantly lower extension moment (0.008 vs. 0.014 BW·BH, <i>p</i> = 0.037) and anterior GRF (0.20 vs. 0.23 BW, <i>p</i> = 0.010). (4) Conclusions: This study proposes a three-phase compensation model for side-cutting: "rotational instability" at initial contact, "protective unloading" during the stance pivot phase, and "force-generation deficit" at push-off. This three-phase framework provides a new paradigm for evaluating dynamic knee function after ACLR and guiding phase-specific rehabilitation.

BioengineeringVol. 12(12)
Tianjin University of Sport (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Beijing Sport University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.