Evaluation of the Marginal Microleakage of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Study

Aim:The aim of the current investigation was to assess the marginal microleakage of two distinct pit and fissure sealants. Materials and methods:In the present study, 40 healthy mandibular premolar teeth that had been extracted for orthodontic purposes were included.Following a random selection process, the samples were split into two groups of 20 each: Group I: Application of Clinpro sealant, group II: Application of UltraSeal XT hydro sealant.Samples were thermocyclized (250 cycles between 5C and 55C) with a 30-second immersion period in each bath and a 10-second transfer period.The samples were submerged in 1% methylene blue for 24 hours.To evaluate the microleakage, all samples were sectioned and examined using a stereomicroscope at a magnification of 10.Scoring criteria were used to assess the extent of microleakage.All data collected and statistically analyzed.Results: The least microleakage was found in the UltraSeal XT hydro sealant group, with a mean of 1.12 0.10, followed by the Clinpro sealant group, with a mean of 2.06 0.06.There was a statistically significant difference found between the groups (p < 0.001).In the Clinpro sealant group, score 1 was more, that is, 9 (45%), followed by score 2, that is, 8 (40%), and score 0 was 3 (15%).In the UltraSeal XT hydro sealant group, score 1 was more, that is, 14 (70%), followed by score 0 was 6 (30%). Conclusion:The present study concluded that the UltraSeal XT hydro sealant group showed significantly reduced microleakage compared to the Clinpro sealant group.Clinical significance: Pit and fissures in the permanent teeth are regarded to be extremely susceptible to cariogenic microbe adherence, which leads to the development of caries.The main problem associated with sealant failure is microleakage.Consequently, sealants can only be regarded as a successful dental caries prevention treatment if they adhere firmly to the tooth and conceal the pits and fissures from the oral microbial environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2714
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Marginal Microleakage of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Study

Muadh A AlGomaiah
World Journal of Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of the Marginal Microleakage of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Study

Muadh A AlGomaiah
article en

Abstract

Aim:The aim of the current investigation was to assess the marginal microleakage of two distinct pit and fissure sealants. Materials and methods:In the present study, 40 healthy mandibular premolar teeth that had been extracted for orthodontic purposes were included.Following a random selection process, the samples were split into two groups of 20 each: Group I: Application of Clinpro sealant, group II: Application of UltraSeal XT hydro sealant.Samples were thermocyclized (250 cycles between 5C and 55C) with a 30-second immersion period in each bath and a 10-second transfer period.The samples were submerged in 1% methylene blue for 24 hours.To evaluate the microleakage, all samples were sectioned and examined using a stereomicroscope at a magnification of 10.Scoring criteria were used to assess the extent of microleakage.All data collected and statistically analyzed.Results: The least microleakage was found in the UltraSeal XT hydro sealant group, with a mean of 1.12 0.10, followed by the Clinpro sealant group, with a mean of 2.06 0.06.There was a statistically significant difference found between the groups (p < 0.001).In the Clinpro sealant group, score 1 was more, that is, 9 (45%), followed by score 2, that is, 8 (40%), and score 0 was 3 (15%).In the UltraSeal XT hydro sealant group, score 1 was more, that is, 14 (70%), followed by score 0 was 6 (30%). Conclusion:The present study concluded that the UltraSeal XT hydro sealant group showed significantly reduced microleakage compared to the Clinpro sealant group.Clinical significance: Pit and fissures in the permanent teeth are regarded to be extremely susceptible to cariogenic microbe adherence, which leads to the development of caries.The main problem associated with sealant failure is microleakage.Consequently, sealants can only be regarded as a successful dental caries prevention treatment if they adhere firmly to the tooth and conceal the pits and fissures from the oral microbial environment.

World Journal of DentistryVol. 16(10)
King Saud University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the Marginal Microleakage of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Study — Muadh A AlGomaiah · World Journal of Dentistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS