The Netherlands at the Crossroads: On the Need for a Covenantal Comeback for Principled Pluralism

Principled pluralism, which overlaps to a significant extent with the concept of covenantal pluralism, is not what it used to be in the Netherlands. The country finds itself at a crossroads regarding church-state relations specifically and religion-society relations more generally. While principled pluralism in the Netherlands broadly reflected the first enabling condition of covenantal pluralism (religious freedom and equal treatment) it has been less effective regarding the other two enabling conditions (religious literacy, and practical virtues of multi-faith engagement). Today there appears to be no real alternative for reinvigorating principled pluralism but by a movement for covenantal pluralism. This article proposes two adjustments to further guarantee the future-proofing of principled pluralism: halting uncontrolled immigration and enhancing integration efforts. These address a key weakness of principled pluralism—its limited defense against views and actions incompatible with the democratic rule of law.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Faith & International Affairs
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2025.2571313
Primary Topic
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Netherlands at the Crossroads: On the Need for a Covenantal Comeback for Principled Pluralism

Hans‐Martien ten Napel
The Review of Faith & International Affairs
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
article

The Netherlands at the Crossroads: On the Need for a Covenantal Comeback for Principled Pluralism

Hans‐Martien ten Napel
article en

Abstract

Principled pluralism, which overlaps to a significant extent with the concept of covenantal pluralism, is not what it used to be in the Netherlands. The country finds itself at a crossroads regarding church-state relations specifically and religion-society relations more generally. While principled pluralism in the Netherlands broadly reflected the first enabling condition of covenantal pluralism (religious freedom and equal treatment) it has been less effective regarding the other two enabling conditions (religious literacy, and practical virtues of multi-faith engagement). Today there appears to be no real alternative for reinvigorating principled pluralism but by a movement for covenantal pluralism. This article proposes two adjustments to further guarantee the future-proofing of principled pluralism: halting uncontrolled immigration and enhancing integration efforts. These address a key weakness of principled pluralism—its limited defense against views and actions incompatible with the democratic rule of law.<br>

The Review of Faith & International AffairsVol. 23(sup1)
Twitter (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Religious Freedom and Discrimination
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.