Incorporating Future Ecosystem Services to Assess the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals in Southern Jiangsu, China

Urban expansion in southern Jiangsu is intensifying the conflict between ecological protection and economic growth, hindering the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, we have not yet seen the development of a framework combining land use/land cover (LULC) simulation, ecosystem service (ES) quantification, and SDG assessment; there is an especially limited understanding of future ES dynamics and their potential to support the SDGs. In this study, we used the PLUS and InVEST models to simulate and quantify carbon storage (CS), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), and habitat quality (HQ) in southern Jiangsu, China, under four 2030 scenarios: business as usual scenario (BAUS), ecological protection redline scenario (EPRS), cropland protection scenario (CPS), and economic development scenario (EDS). Additionally, we assessed the contributions of these ESs in advancing SDGs, guided by the ES-SDG target-SDG linkages. The results revealed a pronounced trade-off between WY and HQ, where the EDS, promoting the highest WY increase (+4.54%), caused the most severe degradation in CS (−5.86%) and HQ (−4.39%). In contrast, the EPRS optimally balanced multiple ESs, enhancing CS (+1.62%) and WY (+2.26%) over the BAUS. Spatially, ESs and the derived SDG index were superior in forested and agricultural clusters compared to urban cores. Overall, the SDG index declined most under the EDS and improved most under the EPRS, highlighting the EPRS as the most sustainable pathway. The sustainability performance regarding SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) was higher than that regarding SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), with Changzhou and Zhenjiang exceeding Suzhou. This study examined the contribution of ESs to the SDGs through four 2030 scenarios, offering insights to guide regional sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112295
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporating Future Ecosystem Services to Assess the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals in Southern Jiangsu, China

Xu Han, Ligang Lv, Pan Haiying, Xiaorui Wang et al.
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Incorporating Future Ecosystem Services to Assess the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals in Southern Jiangsu, China

Xu Han, Ligang Lv, Pan Haiying, Xiaorui Wang, Junjun Zhu
article en

Abstract

Urban expansion in southern Jiangsu is intensifying the conflict between ecological protection and economic growth, hindering the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, we have not yet seen the development of a framework combining land use/land cover (LULC) simulation, ecosystem service (ES) quantification, and SDG assessment; there is an especially limited understanding of future ES dynamics and their potential to support the SDGs. In this study, we used the PLUS and InVEST models to simulate and quantify carbon storage (CS), water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), and habitat quality (HQ) in southern Jiangsu, China, under four 2030 scenarios: business as usual scenario (BAUS), ecological protection redline scenario (EPRS), cropland protection scenario (CPS), and economic development scenario (EDS). Additionally, we assessed the contributions of these ESs in advancing SDGs, guided by the ES-SDG target-SDG linkages. The results revealed a pronounced trade-off between WY and HQ, where the EDS, promoting the highest WY increase (+4.54%), caused the most severe degradation in CS (−5.86%) and HQ (−4.39%). In contrast, the EPRS optimally balanced multiple ESs, enhancing CS (+1.62%) and WY (+2.26%) over the BAUS. Spatially, ESs and the derived SDG index were superior in forested and agricultural clusters compared to urban cores. Overall, the SDG index declined most under the EDS and improved most under the EPRS, highlighting the EPRS as the most sustainable pathway. The sustainability performance regarding SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) was higher than that regarding SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), with Changzhou and Zhenjiang exceeding Suzhou. This study examined the contribution of ESs to the SDGs through four 2030 scenarios, offering insights to guide regional sustainable development.

LandVol. 14(11)
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.