Ignoring what we don't know in accelerometer-based behaviour classification: the open-set recognition problem

Supervised machine learning is commonly used to classify fine-scale behaviours from animal-borne accelerometers, assigning new data to predefined behaviour categories seen during training. These models cannot recognise novel behaviours as 'unknown', however, and, when exposed to new behaviours, will continue to overpredict the known classes. This issue - known as open-set recognition - is an inevitable, but underexplored, limitation in accelerometer-based behaviour classification. Here, we describe the problem and assess four solutions: (1) a multiclass model with an 'other' category, (2) threshold-based models, (3) one-class models and (4) binary one-versus-all models. We show that traditional multiclass models produce high false-positive rates when exposed to behaviours not present during training. We instead suggest the implementation of binary one-versus-all models as a more conservative method, particularly in cases where a single or limited set of behaviours are of interest. Awareness of this challenge will enhance recognition of often unreported uncertainty in real-world applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250722
Primary Topic
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ignoring what we don't know in accelerometer-based behaviour classification: the open-set recognition problem

Bence Ferdinandy, Christofer J. Clemente, David S. Schoeman, Oakleigh Wilson
Journal of Experimental Biology
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
article

Ignoring what we don't know in accelerometer-based behaviour classification: the open-set recognition problem

Bence Ferdinandy, Christofer J. Clemente, David S. Schoeman, Oakleigh Wilson
article en

Abstract

Supervised machine learning is commonly used to classify fine-scale behaviours from animal-borne accelerometers, assigning new data to predefined behaviour categories seen during training. These models cannot recognise novel behaviours as 'unknown', however, and, when exposed to new behaviours, will continue to overpredict the known classes. This issue - known as open-set recognition - is an inevitable, but underexplored, limitation in accelerometer-based behaviour classification. Here, we describe the problem and assess four solutions: (1) a multiclass model with an 'other' category, (2) threshold-based models, (3) one-class models and (4) binary one-versus-all models. We show that traditional multiclass models produce high false-positive rates when exposed to behaviours not present during training. We instead suggest the implementation of binary one-versus-all models as a more conservative method, particularly in cases where a single or limited set of behaviours are of interest. Awareness of this challenge will enhance recognition of often unreported uncertainty in real-world applications.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 229(1)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.